HELLGORITHM

@hellgorithm.website

self-published author of a Zelda fansite. best viewed in Netscape Navigator 3.0

The turn most software devs have taken shouldn't have surprised me. Well before LLMs, most devs I've met had the soul of a landlord Sometimes "landlord trying to be cool". Sometimes "landlord who wants suffering with the rent" But both see the world with the eyes of a rent-seeker

It's increasingly certain that US subscription-based LLMs are financially doomed. People hype up open weight models though. I did some very simple math and, to run e.g. benchmark darling open-weight Kimi K3, the cost of entry is a quarter-million $ on the GPUs alone. Then you have opex.

The higher one thinks of their own intelligence today, the higher the likelihood they've tricked themselves into obsequious worship of a made up machine god. And everything else aside, that is pretty funny.

Few remember the ancient bygone days of spring 2026, when we were reliably told by leading technology brothers that Anthropic was actually profitable (because Anthropic had said so and only stupid fools would doubt them).

Ed Zitron@edzitron.com · 20h ago

Reuters got some of the IPO docs. Anthropic is a total dog of a company. Spent $12.6bn to make $4.6bn in revenue in 2025, $7.33bn of which was compute costs. Operating loss of $8bn. Losses getting worse year over year. Amazing stuff www.reuters.com/business/fin...

Summary
Companies
• Anthropic IPO could value the company at more than $2
trillion
• Anthropic lost $42 billion in 2025
• Al lab spent $7.33 billion on compute and infrastructure last year
• Operating loss widened to $8.06 billion in 2025 from $2.98 billion in 2024
• Execs, industry analysts have expressed concerns over harms of Al tech
Sept 28 (Reuters) - Anthropic is making a massive bet that Al will transform the global economy more profoundly than industrialization, electricity and the internet, according to its IPO prospectus seen by Reuters.
But the cost to get there will be staggering. Anthropic reported a net loss of $42 billion in 2025, and plans to spend $518 billion on cloud, computing and infrastructure obligations in coming year, according to the
prospectus.

After years of my life researching this niche topic, I can feel I'm close to a breakthrough. I think I'll paste the details into this text box owned by a company build on flagrant disregard for attribution that is currently desperate to demonstrate that its product can do novel science.

I have Thoughts about what ought to be done after the Revolution to whomever decided most salad kits should put 3.5 servings on the nutrition label instead of just 3.

Still thinking about Zuckerberg's closest friends consistently letting him win at Catan. Not even one person one time deciding against going along with it. Everyone hollowing themselves out completely just to stay friendly with the Metaverse loser. Profoundly sick stuff.

All of the broader things that we're losing thanks to AI—from being able to trust others to cheap GPUs—are a much bigger issue but what really gets to me personally is just losing respect for people I used to like. Ah it turns out that a shiny toy and flattery overrides your moral compass. Okay.

Some of us still write code without LLMs, for work, every day. And from what I see out there our job satisfaction is so much higher it would frankly be mean to compare it. Out here just shipping qualify software to happy users. There is nothing inevitable about any of this.

Glasses, AirPods, Tamagotchi knockoff pendant… At the end of the day the form factor does not matter any more than whether it will get you to wear a 24/7 camera. They’ll try anything if you’ll just wear the camera. Please wear the camera

I don’t set aside much time to indulge in gaming these days but I am really enjoying Ostranauts today. Played it pre-1.0 a bit and decided to give it another go since 1.0 was released.

Genuinely, half of me thinks the main area of AI experimentation going on right now is in how fully the concept of an "ai agent" can legally indemnify its operators