Jason Eric Bystrom

@jasonbystrom.bsky.social

Multiculti mash-ups from the far edge of the Western world (Berkeley, CA): religion, food, language, education, photography, music, basic human decency.

Who is proud of being a "dogmatist"? Is it a philosophical school or political trend? If you're a Buddhist, Confucian, or contemporary "centrist," claiming you're a "pragmatist" essentially means you think the other guys are inflexible idiots who are insensitive to context, difference, or change

Every executive, investor, marketer, and indeed even every user of an app so cynically and amorally trying to (further) gamify democracy and indeed our humanity itself...should be deeply ashamed. But many seem lacking in basic capacity for shame or thoughtfulness. So we must hold them accountable.

Picture of a large Kalshi ad suggesting that people in 1947 would have used the app to bet on whether baseball would end segregation.

Visiting Weed, California, specifically the local Grocery Outlet. I do not want to get into an argument with this korma! Also, I learned about a completely different definition of “retort” than the one I was thinking about when I made the above quip.

A photograph of a white semi-truck trailer parked on a small embankment. Large hand-painted red letters are displayed prominently across the trailer: Curry King, Indian Food, Mexican Food. A package of Hocco brand heat and eat Navratan Korma. The package includes a claim of “Advanced Retort Technology.”A jar of Zoup brand Chicken Potpie Soup. The label claims that this soup is “thoughtfully crafted.”A screenshot from the Merriam- Webster webpage for the word “retort.” The fourth definition is:

retort 4 of 4
re•tort
ri-tört 
'rē-tort
retorted; retorting; retorts transitive verb
: to treat (something, such as oil shale) by heating in a retort

I'm a progressive because I value diverse and multiethnic spaces with people from many different places and backgrounds intermingling and developing new cultural forms together. A certain kind of discourse of cultural appropriation truly borders on "blood and soil nationalism, but call it leftist."

Perhaps the biggest yikesaroonies of them all is that there’s a guy out there pushing whatever “Chicago Studies” is when every self-respecting academic worth their weight in Old Style knows that it’s “Chicagoland Studies.”

KG Hutchins@songsforhorses.com · 2mo ago

Sorry I still can't get over the fact that a professor of Chicago Studies (???) called nomadic pastoralism "a yikesaroonie" on here. It's activating my feral ghoul gene, my fingertips are already turning colloidal blue

I’m so frustrated that I have to argue 20th century philosophy about whether machines are people and 18th century science about whether germs are real and fucking 15th century colonial bullshit about whether people are human beings.

Blatant, overt, and deliberate violation of the Establishment Clause by Hegseth here “In previous administrations, our Chaplain Corps was infected by political correctness and secular humanism," he said. "...Faith and virtue were traded for self-help and self-care. We started correcting that drift”

Gillian Brockell@gillianbrockell.com · 2mo ago

There are more self-identified Unitarian Universalists in the US than there are Seventh Day Adventists, and both Unitarianism and Universalism are older than SDA (1825, 1793, and 1863, respectively). Yet the former is eliminated altogether and the latter isn’t. What could be the reason?

However, an accompanying video by Hegseth seemed to suggest the change wasn't entirely one of streamlining bureaucracy.
"In previous administrations, our Chaplain Corps was infected by political correctness and secular humanism," he said. "..
...Faith and virtue were traded for self-help and self-care. We started correcting that drift [in December], and today we're going further.

This morning in downtown Berkeley I witnessed a flock of seagulls and a small handful of crows (too few to be a proper murder of crows) band together to chase away a single red-tailed hawk. It was impressive on everyone’s part.

I'm not surprised but I am baffled that "whiny, self-absorbed, untrustworthy, amoral, clearly no principles or sense of duty" is routinely labeled as "masculine." It's like they read scholarly articles on the interwoven nature of masculinity and toxic masculinity and decided "just the toxic parts."