Þhe Renée

@kageneko.bsky.social

InfoSec shitposter, 🏳️‍🌈 Premium cat cushion, Amateur violinist, Will hunt neoNazis for sport, Crafter of ALL the things. Vehemently against generativeAI

“If you’re really that sick you should be in the hospital” Please stop saying this to chronically ill people. If we went to the hospital every time we suffered, we would live there. Hospitals can’t help us and they often make us worse. We are on our own, and being subtly gaslit doesn’t help.

Oh wow. This is proper fucked. That list of folks eligible for a free vaccine is *narrow*. So anyway, we gave BHP $600m in diesel rebates this past year. You know they really needed them because in the same year the company booked a $14b profit.

Fewer Australians will qualify for free COVID-19 vaccines from October - Australian Pharmacist

COVID-19 vaccines move onto the NIP this week. Who is now eligible for a funded vaccine and what should pharmacists tell patients who aren’t?

australianpharmacist.com.au

Last spring I was asked to write a piece with tips on how to suss out AI-generated images. I countered that that premise weakens democracy by promoting the idea that everyone can claim expertise regardless of their credentials, a key tenet of anti-democratic technoutopianism. What strikes me now…1/n

An excerpt of my piece for Art in America: 
At some point, every person needs to accept that they cannot claim impartiality or universal expertise: I cannot tell if a bridge is safe to drive over or determine whether my lettuce contains E. coli. So I value agencies and organizations that employ experts who can. The same goes for the sources of information I consume, including those that provide images illustrating current events, who should be responsible for doing the provenance research outlined here. That's as far as my own provenance research can go.
One model for alleviating the paranoia may be as simple as supporting news agencies and image archives that employ professionals to authenticate the images they reproduce. The Associated Press has now shown this can be done.
If this seems impractical, I have to ask: what's more impractical, strengthening journalistic integrity, or requiring that all consumers of news become their own digital forensics experts?

you don’t hold "AI" accountable; you hold AI developers, vendors, and corporations that profit off it accountable holding "AI accountable" is like holding a toaster accountable. it's an inanimate object. it doesn't have wishes, feelings, or desires

btw if you comment on poor/low income people getting something nice, by saying something like ‘you got xyz nice thing when you were saying you were poor’ or otherwise shaming someone for getting a treat, you’re the problem. It’s not a flex. You are garbage. people can save up for nice stuff.

I am so stoked to announce my Detective Beans colouring book is out today in Australia and next week in NZ!!! 😻🎨✏️ (My inner child is screaming with happiness right now)

Bild

I'd suspect a vast majority of the heterosexual community would be stunned to hear that up until *1992* consensual homosexual activities could be prosecuted as service offences under Australian military discipline law. Or that only *now* can such convictions be removed.

MEDIA RELEASE
6 October 2026
REMOVING HISTORICAL HOMOSEXUAL DEFENCE SERVICE CONVICTIONS
Current or former Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel can now apply to have historical homosexual convictions extinguished from their service records.
 
Up until 1992, consensual homosexual activities could be prosecuted as service offences under Australian military discipline law.
 
While it has long been decriminalised, people still carry the burden of service convictions appearing on their service records for consensual same-sex activities that occurred before this change.
 
To address the ongoing harm caused by these historical convictions, the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) was recently amended to allow eligible individuals to apply to have convictions for consensual activity formally extinguished, meaning they are treated as if the conviction never happened.
 
This is a significant step towards recognising that these laws and policies were discriminatory and caused profound and lasting harm to many Defence people and their families.
 
Extinguishing these convictions will restore dignity and legal equality to affected individuals and their families.
 
The Defence discipline system is the final jurisdiction in Australia to allow for extinguishment of such convictions.
 
Any person who has a conviction of an historical homosexual service offence, their representative, or a person with a special interest in the conviction, can apply under the scheme. Family members of deceased veterans can also apply under this scheme on behalf of their loved ones.
 
Former Defence personnel who believe they were administratively separated due to a prevailing discriminatory Defence policy can seek a review of their administrative separation and have their record updated.

Are there any active groups/resources for disabled birders in the UK? I'm trying to improve access at our local reserve (Portbury Wharf) and to get funding we have to show that people will actually use it (not just me). I have created a map to show how accessible it is so far #UKBirding

a map of Portbury Wharf Nature Reserve showing all the different path surfaces, ramps, gates & inclines.