Torsten Kathke

@kathke.com

Historian. 19th/20th century US & Germany. LMU Munich. 70s/80s cultural criticism, pop science, futurology. Book: Wires That Bind.

1. historians don't get the luxury of "slow work" in this day and age. 2. Many of our objections are centered around the fact that WE need to be the ones reading and thinking about our sources, not some LLM. Its about understanding and owning the process. 3. Using gAI is cutting corners.


Megan Stevenson
@MeganTStevenson
One of the more interesting concerns I see historians raising about AI is the loss of serendipitous insights that come from slow work. I disagree that slow is always better but do think that skilled work with AI requires a specific vigilance to avoid cutting corners.

0.33l in a glass bottle: just about the right amount of soda. 0.33l in a can: just about the right amount of soda. 0.33l in a plastic bottle: what the hell why so small why would anyone ever think this is enough?

Why are people pretending we're on the verge of AI becoming sentient in the same world in which Microsoft Office is confused about which timezone I'm in on a regular basis?

I believe this 100%. The moral injury of the period, the grief from not just the too and so many deaths but the kinds of lives we had before, the laying bare of disposability, the non covid deaths it sped, the institutional strain, the collective fear and distrust, the prioritization of work anyway

The Fig Economy@figgityfigs.bsky.social · last wk.

One of my Crank Theories of Everything, at least of Everything in the Recent Past, is that we are dealing (badly) with COVID trauma we’d mostly prefer to pretend never happened.