Tessera
Folgen

Kotoneshoemi (COMMS OPEN)

@kotoneshoemi.bsky.social

Artist, Gamer, likes FPS, RPGs and More He/They 23

1377 Posts388 Follower317 Folgt
Roxie@roxieproxy.bsky.social · 12h ago

Remember when Atlus insisted The Answer wouldn't be in Reload before announcing it as paid DLC like a month after launch? Are we getting a Persona 4 Revival Bisexuality Expansion Pass?

Ultima@ultimashadow.bsky.social · 13h ago

YOU CAN'T DATE YOSUKE IN P4 REVIVAL BECAUSE IT'D BE TOO MUCH WORK? "We were thinking if we did Yosuke, we kinda have to add all the other male characters as well. And if we did that, like that's a lot of work. I don't know if we could handle that." THIS IS SO STUPID AND MISSING THE POINT, COME ON

Agent Pearlie (Splatoon Marie’s Wife) ⚢@pearlwoomy.bsky.social · 12h ago

Parents, please don’t post photos of your kids online if you can help it, *especially* in this day and age. AI trains off of existing photos, which unfortunately could even be those of your own kids (deepfakes of adults have been a thing, even if the original photo wasn’t NSFW). Keep your kids safe!

Sapling 🌱@sacredsapling.bsky.social · 20h ago

Woke up to this news and I’m beyond disgusted. It’s a US *constitutional right* now to create and own ‘CSAM,’ as long as it was made with AI?? AI gen images are built from real images, of real children. This directly re-exploits every single CSAM survivor. (More in 🧵) #abolition #trafficking

A federal judge has ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual's right to privately possess child sexual abuse content created using Al if it does not depict a real person and remains in the home. On Tuesday, Judge John Z. Lee of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th District ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual's right to privately possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using artificial intelligence if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home. In his ruling, Judge Lee urged the Supreme Court to reconsider the issue of virtual abuse material of children in the age of Al, suggesting that technological advances complicate existing legal precedent. The case Lee ruled on came about in 2024 when the Department of Justice brought charges against Steven Anderegg, alleging that he used Al to create thousands of explicit images of children. He was accused of breaking federal obscenity laws by producing, distributing and possessing obscene visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Anderegg sought to have the possession and production charges dismissed under the First Amendment. Last year, a judge in the Western District of Wisconsin agreed to dismiss the possession charge, prompting the federal prosecutors to appeal. Lee, in his ruling upholding the lower court's decision, cited the precedent set by Supreme Court rulings from 1969 and 2002. One held that individuals have a right to possess obscenity in the privacy of their home. The other found that "virtual" child sexual abuse material, not depicting a real person is not child pornography.
Danielle Ryan@danirat.bsky.social · 2d ago

I think another lesson to take from the loss of both Dolly and Tim Curry is that neither of them took themselves seriously but they took the work dead serious that's the most important thing pour all of yourself into the craft but have fun and don't get an ego.