Laura Marsh

@lauramarsh.bsky.social

Literary Editor, The New Republic

It's astonishing how many companies think people want to use AI to eliminate any remaining/potential social contacts they might have in an already very atomized culture. Genuinely who is the audience for "get the AI to read to your kid," "use AI to avoid speaking to a barista"?

More Perfect Union@moreperfectunion.bsky.social · 7d ago

Starbucks CEO says the company is planning to focus more on AI and tech, including a adding system that would recognize customers as they arrive in stores to "present personalized digital menus."

Just got an email announcing that Princeton is offering ChatGPT accounts to all undergrads next semester. Looking forward to other helpful innovations lIke giving them unlimited heroin or free handguns

I know that Big Publishers are owned by corporations but there probably needs to be an understanding that in the future some products will be more valuable because they are not made by AI, the way that organic food is more expensive because it is not produced with that very useful tool, pesticides.

never mind having a personal AI assistant, whatever that might be, or outsourcing loving your children to it.... i need to know why you would name your personal AI assistant 'Dazzle'

Not to obsess over Marissa Mayer but what a weird profile. Written in a fawning tone, while it reproduces some of the dumbest and most harmful attitudes to childbirth and post-partum you could imagine. Wtf happened here?

Bild

I'm halfway through Ruth Schwartz Cowan's More Work For Mother, and so far the tldr is technology that promises solve for the problem of women doing most of the work in the home has a funny way of simply generating even more work to fill up the new space www.nytimes.com/2026/10/25/s...

Can Marissa Mayer, Yahoo’s Former CEO, Help Fix A.I.’s Gender Problem?  (Gift Article)

Marissa Mayer made her name as a pioneer at Google, then as chief executive at Yahoo. Now Mayer is entering the crowded marketplace for A.I. assistants — and hoping to draw in more women.

nytimes.com

AOC: "As AI begins to encroach in our society, their goal is to take your cognition away from you. AI's goal is to take your thoughts away from you, your ability to think away from you, so that you become dependent on a machine ... reading books is active resistance"

It's odd for people to act as if treating the subject of a documentary or a book etc. as a human being is some sort of mitigating artistic choice. In fact, it's the necessary first step to telling a worthwhile story about a person.

I think it's possible to hold in our minds two things: 1 - a person committed a crime, is to receive the punishment our society has agreed on for that 2 - we can still be interested in what happens next; not all of our interactions with them (and their families) need to take the form of condemnation

Zito@zeets.bsky.social · 2w ago

I think this is a failure of the film, though. Malcolm Harris and John Carreyrou have been pushing back against this because this framing of “knowing the human” is inherently sympathetic and it achieves this by ignoring so many of the hard facts. For one, she chased that public attention.

“What started out as a straight documentary turns into an almost absurd, almost distasteful experiment, and an argument that the only real way to know something is not through hours of faithful recording but through an elaborate artifice.” @lauramarsh.bsky.social newrepublic.com/article/2167...

You Can See Everything Is Unexpectedly Heartbreaking

Without making excuses for the Theranos fraud, Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim’s documentary insists on Elizabeth Holmes’s humanity.

newrepublic.com

I couldn't fit this into the piece but you really appreciate how distant Fielder is later when Amanda Seyfried immediately tells Elizabeth Holmes "you're wonderful!" out of sheer politeness

Bild