Leo Barasi

@leobarasi.bsky.social

Mostly climate change & public opinion. Book: The Climate Majority http://amzn.to/3h73dfm

++BREAKING++ Leading climate scientists in the UK have written to senior editors in broadcast media - and OFCOM and IPSO: "To express our concern about recent media coverage of extreme weather, climate change and net-zero and to urge you…to inform public audiences of the scientific links"

BildBild

It seems to have become commonplace to blame net zero for Britain’s high energy bills and/or weak job market… … and I guess I’ll have to explain again why there is very little evidence of this. Britain has plenty of economic problems; net zero is not high on that list (though climate change is) 🧵

Ed Miliband would be ‘noose around neck’ of job creation as chancellor, union boss warns

Comments by Sharon Graham come as Burnham team explores key government appointments

giftarticle.ft.com

I sometimes think about how climate models say the UK normally won’t get any days above 35C at current global warming and we’ve now had them in 3 of the last 5 years

Map of how many days the UK will see on average each year above 35C at 1.5C of warming (just over where we are now), showing we shouldn’t expect any. Upshot, models have underestimated extreme heat for NW Europe

I sometimes think about how climate models say the UK normally won’t get any days above 35C at current global warming and we’ve now had them in 3 of the last 5 years

Map of how many days the UK will see on average each year above 35C at 1.5C of warming (just over where we are now), showing we shouldn’t expect any. Upshot, models have underestimated extreme heat for NW Europe

It will be record hot today because of climate change. It will keep getting hotter until the world reaches net zero emissions. These are the facts of the case and they are undisputed.

It will be record hot today because of climate change. It will keep getting hotter until the world reaches net zero emissions. These are the facts of the case and they are undisputed.

Recent Harvard-led study on nuclear power and cancer in Nature Comms found: "cancer mortality among individuals aged 65+, associated with proximity to nuclear power plants, averaged 4266 deaths [in the US] per year" Which is wild! At odds with anything I've seen BUT...

National analysis of cancer mortality and proximity to nuclear power plants in the United States - Nature Communications

‘Populations residing near nuclear power plants may experience low-level chronic exposure to ionizing radiation through environmental release pathways. In here the authors find higher cancer mortality...

nature.com