Logan Bowers

@loganb.bsky.social

Toots on housing policy, economics, computing.

Zoning codes would never allow the iconic buildings we now cherish. Seattle’s famous Smith Tower could never be rebuilt on this site because it’s too tall, has too much area, doesn’t step back upper floors, and doesn’t have a gargantuan loading dock

Bild

Visited a friend in a new development in Bothell. It was all the density of the city with none of the walkabilty. Fine as an affordability matter, but why are we causing this outcome? Some of my AV optimism comes from hoping to break the car spell that drives at least some of it.

David Roberts@volts.wtf · 2d ago

I know I'm a fey, out-of-touch coastal elite, etc. etc., not representative of heartland values etc. etc., but still ... I simply can not imagine wanting to live in a place like this.

The owner wants to replace the windows with in-kind versions to remove leaks and draftiness for their residents. Landmarks is now saying the state law doesn’t matter and because they designated it late they still want a $50,000 window assessment which makes housing cost more passing that to renters

Yeah, totally. Being a good boss and both picking and managing a staff is a real skill! It requires years of practice and experience for all but the most gifted leaders. We’re all responsible for our own choices, but charitably I’ll say I feel bad for her that she may not have known going in.

Just from the information in the article, I think this is a counterintuitive case where recycling is worse for the environment. Glass fibers are just melted down rocks. So who cares if we’re burying waste rock fiber? We’re not short land. Recycling the fibers is… 1/2

John Smillie@johnsmillie42.bsky.social · 2w ago

www.ecoportal.net/uk/wind-turb... Opponents love the picture of the landfill filled with turbine blades, but that's not the primary outcome any more.

The nice thing about being wealthy (as a nation) is that you get to spend your resources (earned money) on whimsical things. As an engineer, I feel this way about anything that is a lifestyle brand. But people like branded stuff, so I guess that’s how it is.

David Roberts@volts.wtf · 2w ago

Something I think about a lot is how the US created a system that produces safe, clean, virtually limitless drinking water for every citizen -- a political & engineering miracle for the ages! -- & then went ahead & created a huge, polluting, pointless bottled water industry anyway.

Another example is in-unit appliance rental. A big reason this is done is because federal housing money is only available under a specific rent limit that is too low to build in Seattle. So renting out “add-ons” is a workaround for a high CoL city. So the solution is not build subsidized housing.

This is a great example of vibes making renters’ lives worse. Like, for example, pets do increase wear and tear, so the outcome here is either pets get banned, or non-pet renters subsidize renters with pets. How is that a good use of public policy?

Mayor Katie B. Wilson@mayor.seattle.gov · 4w ago

Join me, Councilmember Dionne Foster, City Attorney Erika Evans, and community leaders as we stand in support of new renter protections to curb junk fees and make Seattle more affordable. Rally at 12pm, Council hearing at 2pm. www.capitolhillseattle.com/2026/07/visi...