Rachel Lambert, prof at UCSB, teacher!

@mathematize4all.bsky.social

disability rights, neurodiversity, mathematical sensemaking for all, educational justice.Trying to making math classrooms engaging and empowering spaces for all kids https://mathematizing4all.com/ Author of Rethinking Disability and Mathematics #UDLMath

When a good and decent person leaves this world, I think the best thing we can do to honor them is to try to put even more goodness and decency into the world. It's not that we can replace them or their contribution. It's just that we need it all the more now that they're gone.

My other piece of unsolicited writing advice is to always have two things going at the same time because you can use one to procrastinate on the other until they’re both done.

"Directives reflected a predetermined, outcome‑driven approach to enforcement rather than a fact‑based investigative process ... staff were encouraged to invert the standard sequence of investigation, compliance review, and legal analysis and instead work backward from desired settlement terms."

Dominique Baker@bakerdphd.bsky.social · last wk.

Might be the clearest evidence we have that the university settlements/agreements were quid pro quo to get investigations stopped (I'm a policy expert, not a lawyer, so don't trust me on that). Also that list of violations in the final screenshot is a doozy.

Screenshot of whistleblower disclosure which reads: That afternoon, days after HHS expanded its investigation from Columbia’s medicalschools to the entire university, Shieh announced that Columbia appeared ready to settle. Shiehsaid that because Columbia might settle, the OCR team did not need to issue a Title VI finding.Shieh further explained that if Columbia settled, the investigation would end.36 He then orderedthe DOJ assignees along with several OCR attorneys and HHS OGC attorneys to focus on BrownUniversity, including expanding the compliance review from the medical school to the entireuniversity, following the same blueprint as with Columbia.37these directives reflected a predetermined, outcome‑drivenapproach to enforcement rather than a fact‑based investigative process. staff wereencouraged to invert the standard sequence of investigation, compliance review, and legal analysisand instead work backward from desired settlement terms, including provisions not directly tiedto substantiated Title VI anti‑harassment or antisemitism violations, to generate proposed findingsthat would support those terms.

The very people who accuse others of "staying silent" are SILENT THEMSELVES ON 1000 issues a day which is NORMAL because you are ONE PERSON & simply cannot have takes on every single thing.

Americans have more confidence in higher education than in big tech companies, and the gap is growing rather than shrinking. The higher ed-doomsday pundits need to get on board with the real vibe shift in public trust that is happening right now.

BildBild
Mark Copelovitch@mcopelov.bsky.social · last mo.

I look forward to all the reports & coverage about all of the internal problems & mistakes of all of these other institutions, in the same way that universities are constantly blamed (& blaming themselves) for “declining trust.” “Compared to what?” news.gallup.com/poll/712436/...

Given the lost of my close colleague and friend to colorectal cancer in October, who was only 42, please please get screened for colorectal cancer early if you have any symptoms. Especially if you are queer, male, and Black or Brown. news.stanford.edu/stories/2026...

Why is colorectal cancer rising in adults under 50?

Colorectal cancer is now the No. 1 cause of cancer deaths among people under age 50. Here’s what Stanford Medicine experts want you to know.

news.stanford.edu