Nom de Plume Brett

@maverickbrett.bsky.social

I mean nom de plume literally means pen name. Engineer playing god poorly. Fund basic science research. (He/Him)🏳️‍🌈

Hot take: the reason why we don’t count amphibs as aircraft carriers is purely because the United States Navy builds dedicated ones because we spoke into a really weird design tree for i’m fighting the Soviets not because you have to.

Also readiness is not some quanta that you store like munitions, it is a measure of what has happened over the past ~2 years you have to continuously invest in it! Folks rotate units, and leave services, now what you can lose like this is air frame hours!

Mike Black@mikeblack114.bsky.social · 3h ago

Readiness is a different can of worms, because you can invest in MRO to help to a point (the preexisting hole was much deeper there) but you can't regain the time lost from high end training and reset without more time, and that requires the war to actually stop/deployments to end

Munitions hole is already being filled, we are already putting metric buttloads of money into this and MRO capabilities and the overall SRM chain, it’s already happening. They are the easier parts of this to remedy it will just take time

"Online Rent-a-Sage" Bret Devereaux@bretdevereaux.bsky.social · 3h ago

I know it sucks, but Dems have got to be prepared to inherit a munitions-and-readiness hole that is going to be expensive to fill, but which will need to be filled. Hardly the only such hole, but it will be a big one.

The problem with thinking that we have to do either of these is that we can stand not losing, but having no chance to win for a really, really, really long time. Like we could just go back to dumping LGB’s on costal sites for years. This is not going to end any time before January 2027.

Nicholas Grossman@nicholasgrossman.bsky.social · 4h ago

The Trump White House now must choose: 1) Bigger humiliation than last time, accepting Iran in control of Hormuz and charging tolls, the very thing the US attacked last month to prevent 2) Escalation of uncertain outcome with no strategy and despite depleted stockpiles

The thing about tactical nukes is that we deployed them across Asia during the Cold War but withdrew them starting in the 70s (Japan/Okinawa, Taiwan, Philippines) because they were security/logistical/political headaches and basically made obsolete by sea and CONUS based forces.

Jesse Johnson@jljzen.bsky.social · 7h ago

The Defense Department’s policy chief is drafting a new U.S. nuclear strategy that emphasizes the possible use of shorter-range tactical weapons in case of a regional war with China or Russia, according to five people familiar with the plans. www.nbcnews.com/politics/nat...

Remember you have to poll to set the model, and then poll to the model. Now obvi we don’t actualy treat these as discrete we project from past stuff to set the model poll and then modify the model for next round but it’s still really not working.

Nom de Plume Brett@maverickbrett.bsky.social · 16h ago

Have we considered we’re not good a polling? Like the overs are by so far it says the underlying polling models are *fucked*. Like we are just not sampling well enough to calibrate models.

I like how our strategy in the gulf has just reverted to the only successful one we have tried: do nothing but blockade. We should come up with something better, and like this would be a W for navalists if they picked it up becasue their broader love has faild, but uhh I don't see either happening

It's debatable how thoroughly DI has historically penetrated US operations before, but like I'm sorry but we are superposed to think in the present setting of Cuba we have been able to expand operations? TBH this is likely if not out right not true -as in it was fed to politico as chicken scratch-

Shipwreck@shipwreck75.bsky.social · 21h ago

Trump administration has increased intelligence operations in Cuba as part of a broader effort to pressure the communist government into major reforms or a change in power.