WOR$T GIRL IN ACADEMIA

@medievaliste.bsky.social

underemployed musicologist, sometime professor research: music, political culture, history, and identity in medieval England, Scotland, and beyond currently writing: musicispolitics.beehiiv.com British-American, based in LA for my sins

If you teach music history responsibly, inevitably someone will inform you that you are doing it wrong by failing to focus on "the music itself", meaning "the notes on the page". The notes, being representative of specific pitches, are quantifiable in ways that history and politics simply are not.

Glenn Mackin@glennmackin.bsky.social · yesterday

Even without the AI crap, there is a strong tendency to substitute quantification for thinking, and exchanges of information for communication. And yes, it produces its own special form of stupidity

I doubt anyone would criticize research publications in medicine or engineering as ‘gatekeepy’ or ‘for elites’ - ie inscrutable to laypeople. They should be inscrutable to laypeople. They are inscrutable to me! But humanities scholarship does not NEED to be legible to laypeople.

Saw a post on another platform critiquing scholarly publishing for being ‘gatekeepy’ and ‘for elites’ and I hate to break it to you but specialized peer reviewed research for highly-trained experts is…quality assured material for a narrow professional audience

This afternoon I have the privilege of sitting in on a former graduate student’s doctoral dissertation defense. I wrote her many glowing recommendation letters, all highly deserved. Back then, I thought the payoff was seeing her get into her dream doctoral program. I was wrong: this is even better.

My modest wish for myself is to once again sit in a room with other people who want to learn things and talk about the books and essays we read this week. My big expensive brain does not require an LLM to do that; it requires an employment contract.

The very people who accuse others of "staying silent" are SILENT THEMSELVES ON 1000 issues a day which is NORMAL because you are ONE PERSON & simply cannot have takes on every single thing.

"Enrollment data posted on archives of Illinois Tech’s website show a loss of approximately 1,200 international graduate students between the fall of 2024 and 2025 — a significant decline for a school that enrolled 7,500 students overall last year."

Anna Kornbluh@annakornbluh.bsky.social · 4d ago

today in demolishing higher ed is economic sabotage, bonus racism 160 workers fired because regime hates international students www.wbez.org/education/20...

I interviewed for a different publisher with offices in the same building. Then I worked in one of the shops on the ground floor. It was an interesting place to work, especially if you got to see inside the storerooms upstairs, which I did.

John Scalzi@scalzi.com · 4d ago

My publisher was in this building for many years and while it was absolutely an impractical building, I loved visiting and am sad that now the only people who will get to see the view from it are a bunch of rich folks www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...

I like this notetaking example. it is a good case of how gender works. Notetaking has never been about producing a transcript. It is a bureaucratic skill in the 20th c. organixarion because it is SENSEMAKING. Those women socialized to take notes? They have been doing men’s metacognition for them

Jennifer Romig @jennifermromig.bsky.social · 4d ago

Notetaking in meetings is tiny case in point - used to be some predictable social assumptions who would do it; now anyone can offer to do ”notetaking” by turning on the AI listener. Further interesting scenario is human recollection / notes (taken by habit by a person) conflict with AI summary

again, the danger from AI is not that it will attain sentience and destroy us. the danger is that it's a mindless flattery machine and being mindlessly flattered literally drives people insane.

Post nicht verfügbar.

As a former Writing Center tutor and director: Writing Centers are a critical resource for connecting students to the dialogic nature of academic writing and teaching them that they have ideas worth expressing.

Greg Pak@gregpak.net · 5d ago

Disgraceful actions by @harvard.edu - destroying their writing program at a time when it's needed more than ever as "A.i." undermines everything. Deepest shame on this institution and all the best to @janerosenzweig.bsky.social. www.thecrimson.com/article/2026...

It’s fine to be angry when people write things you find offensive or just disagree with, but you do actually need to read the whole thing if you’re going to respond intelligently. You’re not genAI; you don’t need to rely on a someone else’s summary or selective screenshot to form your opinion.

The thought of coming back to a book—and finding a sliver of myself from years ago that I would have otherwise lost forever—floods me with good feelings. Treating a book like a sterile, one-way medium is disheartening.