ꭓle Ormsby 𓆙

@motivickyle.bsky.social

Numbers and shapes at Reed College. Mathematician, parent, spouse, runner, 𝔣𝔯𝔞𝔨𝔱𝔲𝔯 enthusiast. He or they.

Resolving ambiguity in order of operations is easy: simply enumerate all possible parsings of a given expression, compute each value, and then average. E.g., for 9-3-3÷3, ((9−3)−3)÷3 = 1 (9−(3−3))÷3 = 3 (9−3)−(3÷3) = 5 9−(3−(3÷3)) = 7 9−((3−3)÷3) = 9 so 9-3-3÷3 = (1+3+5+7+9)/5 = 5. Voilà! 🧮

If mathematicians are going to call the dimension of the image of a linear transformation its 𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑘, they could at least have the courtesy to call the dimension of its kernel its 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑒, whence 𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑘-𝑎𝑛𝑑-𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚 could replace 𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑘-𝑛𝑢𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦. 🧮

Fascinating tool use at all stages of the mathematical process — discovery, formalization, and writing — from David Roe and David Turturean. (Despite the title, they give TWO presentations of the absolute Galois group of ℚ₂.) roed314.github.io/gq2/

A Presentation of the Absolute Galois Group of Q₂

An explicit marked profinite presentation of the absolute Galois group of the 2-adic numbers: four generators, two word relations, and a pro-2 condition on the wild generators, with an interactive web...

roed314.github.io

I think the right move, which I don't see enough of, is developing a synthetic philosophy of how to co-exist with all this, as humans have had to try do in past industrial revolutions. If I could convince a think tank to hire a cartoonist, I'd be doing it tomorrow instead of between projects.

Just as there’re miles of space between what the AGI weirdos say and what the models can do doesn’t mean that they’re not profoundly powerful and unsettling technologies.

Ironically, we will have no choice but to pivot from saying correct things, to saying compelling things (y'know, like basically every other discipline).

I do think a fascinating consequence of the foundations crisis of the early 20th century was mathematics as a discipline* basically going ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ and carrying on as usual. *Yes, not all mathematicians, but most of us

> I presume the proof is correct (there's supposedly a Lean formalization, after all), but it will take me some time to digest it. This is why math is still important in a world where AI can provide nontrivial proofs. There's far more to care about with most interesting questions than yes/no.

Henry Yuen@henryyuen.bsky.social · 4d ago

Life was busy so I didn't get a chance to look, but I guess now the cat's out of the bag so I probably should opine a bit. I presume the proof is correct (there's supposedly a Lean formalization, after all), but it will take me some time to digest it.

Tomorrow I embark on a new collaboration with Mt St Helens, circumnavigating the Loowit Trail as part of the Volcanic 50k race. This will be my third trip around the mountain, and first return to ultrarunning since 2018. Anticipatory quivering has commenced.

Photo of stream and trees coursing down the flanks of St Helens. Taken during a 2015 recon run.

It's extremely rare that I see a math paper take history at all seriously. The writing in this paper by Asok, Bachmann and Hopkins is inspiring to me; writing here in part to remember to find time to read it... arxiv.org/abs/2607.26190

Algebraic vs. analytic: a survey

Given a pair of complex algebraic varieties, we can ask: does every analytic map admit an algebraic representative? Such questions are most interesting when the source and target are non-compact varie...

arxiv.org

9. By far my favorite thing in the film is Robert Pattinson's hilarious and sexy Antinous. If anyone ever wants to make a spin off TV series with Antinous risen from the dead to mess with other mythical households, I would be so there for it.