Dr. Natalie Papini

@nataliep310.bsky.social

Lifelong Learner & Outdoor Enthusiast. Asst. Prof. at NAU 🌲 I study eating disorders, weight stigma, & self-compassion. Views are my own 🌻

At some point we have forgotten that there must be a social contract and we as reviewers, readers and colleagues expect a bare minimum, default of truthfulness, correctness and collegiality. Otherwise, we're not doing science anymore 🧪

will pooley@willpooley.bsky.social · 4mo ago

absolutely wild to see people out here saying that it is responsibility of peer reviewers to check for hallucinated references. it is hard enough to persuade people to read articles and provide reviews. expecting them to spend hours cross reffing literature is unreal.

One of the more depressing aspects of the GLP-1 stuff right now is how utterly inescapable it is. Whatever you're doing, wherever you are, there are people shrinking at alarming rates, and endless discussion of said shrinking. There's seemingly no place to just *rest.*

The best thing I did this break was leave my laptop at home. I worried that I would regret the decision & that disconnecting was something that could happen “after tenure.” If this year has shown me anything, it’s that time is our most precious resource. When it’s gone, we can’t get it back.

Listen, I know the peer review process is painfully broken. I just didn't realize the extent of brokenness. This paper has been under review for ~5 months. Any advice? Before anyone comes for me: Im not complaining without being part of the solution. I easily reviewed 20+ papers this past year.

Bild

"[I]t will be critical to maintain a human in the loop even as we seek to incorporate the strengths of #AI-based review in our editorial process." Read this Editorial from the editors and staff of JAMA and the JAMA Network journals. ja.ma/4oXjl3H

An article titled "Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review" published in JAMA on August 28, 2025. The article discusses the role of AI in peer review, noting AI's potential to automate tasks but also warning of biases.

Steve Kerr: "I believe in academic freedom. I think it's crucial for all of our institutions to be able to handle their own business the way they want to. And they should not be shaken down and told what to teach, what to say, by our government. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard."

Ben Ross@benross.bsky.social · last yr.

Steve Kerr wore a Harvard basketball shirt after the Warriors’ win tonight: “Yes, this is me supporting Harvard. Way to go. Way to stand up to the bully.”

Our article, “Eating disorders and later incidence of cancer – A nationwide longitudinal study in Denmark” is out today. This one was a team effort & I’m so grateful to UNC CEED for their collaborations over the years. 🩵 www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Eating disorders and later incidence of cancer – A nationwide longitudinal study in Denmark

We examined the incidence of cancer types among individuals with eating disorders (EDs).A nationwide longitudinal study of 6,807,731 individuals born …

sciencedirect.com

Hey - please help save jobs and lives! Anyone who works at a university, who works on medical research, or could benefit from medical research is at risk! Please tell them to click the link below. Takes 2 seconds, literally. click.info.apa.org?qs=09c745fe0...

Tell Congress to Stop NIH Cuts

Please take 2 minutes today to ask Congress to take steps to stop funding cuts to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The administration's proposed cuts to federal research funding, particul...

click.info.apa.org

Sheila Schuster when asked how we keep going (advocating/fighting for progress) in this political environment “Think of the people you’re serving. And we can’t give up- that’s letting them win” Needed that today.

“NIH produces an astounding return on investment to the American taxpayer. In Fiscal Year 2022, NIH research funding supported 568,585 jobs and generated $96.84 billion in economic activity — that’s $2.64 of economic activity for every $1 of research funding.” www.researchamerica.org/2023-oped-us...

Catherine Rampell@crampell.bsky.social · 2y ago

Research supported by NIH has led more than 100 Nobel Prizes and has supported more than 99% of drugs approved by federal regulators from 2010 to 2019. But come January, NIH may face a wrecking ball nytimes.com/2024/12/01/h...