Dr Nick Dickinson

@nickdickinson.bsky.social

Political Scientist | British Politics and History | PhD on political salaries (Exeter) | Mst. Modern British and European History (Oxford) | DMs closed, email me @n.dickinson3@exeter.ac.uk

My thanks to Nick for such a generous response! I research on 2 key areas of political leadership: 1. Mayors and devolution 2. Political advisers, esp. Downing Street Chief-of-Staff. Both pretty current and happy to talk about either!

Dr Nick Dickinson@nickdickinson.bsky.social · 7h ago

I don't know Max personally but his research couldn't be more relevant to the direction of UK politics right now. Political leadership and devolution? Yeah I'm sure that won't be important in the next few years.

Hi, I'm being made redundant by the University of Southampton at the end of this month. I'm desperately looking for work. I'll consider all offers but have particular skills in policy, strategy and research. I also have a consultancy service I offer. Please let me know if you hear of anything

Interesting to think about what these occasions are. Mortgages are one (if that counts as consumer). Maybe stuff which saves/makes you money faster than the interest you pay? Almost nothing but property increases in value reliably to not be a leveraged bet.

Will Stancil@whstancil.bsky.social · yesterday

One way I know “boots theory” is not true is that if it WERE true, poor people should consider taking out loans to upgrade their consumer goods, and there are very few instances in which anyone should do that

This is indeed how the British constitution works. It would be a breach of ECHR Article X but that’s parliamentary sovereignty. The only thing Parliament can’t easily do is extend its term. But it can even do that with Lords consent. We have very weak de jure protections on democratic backsliding.

Randy Herman@randyhermanlaw.com · yesterday

Sorry, I am American so I must be confused. So if Reform controlled Parliament and they passed a bill that said white supremacy was a "belief protected in English law" it would no longer be legal to criticize white supremacy? Is that really how your law works?

Good thread. Iran might have been better not enforcing its interpretation of the MOU clauses on the strait, and hoping the US moved on after 60 days without reimposing sanctions. On the other hand getting effective recognition on the strait ups long run leverage to force US fulfilment on sanctions.

Alexander Clarkson@aphclarkson.bsky.social · yesterday

Friendly reminder for everyone on here and the other site getting excited about the Strait of Hormuz that revenue accrued through it will come nowhere close to financing the rebuilding of Iran's economy. For the Iranian regime and people it is sanctions relief that is the long term ballgame.

There are only two options: a) create a humanitarian crisis across Iran and the Gulf, possibly not even opening the strait at the end b) give up, let Iran administer the strait but retain the threat of strikes on nuclear infrastructure Option b) is more rational, but way too humiliating for Trump

Ash Oro@ashoro.co.uk · 2d ago

For this evening - back to #TheHormuzCrisis Trump seems to be becoming more desperate and frustrated. He finally may have seen the reason everyone has treated Iran as they have for the last 40 years is this situation was inevitable. I do not know where this leads - he is too volatile to analyse.

🟢 JOB: Lecturer in Law, University of Stirling 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 A full-time, permanent Teaching & Research Lectureship at Grade 7 or Grade 8. The successful candidate will join our School of Law, Politics and Social Sciences. #Law #ScotsLaw #AcademicJob #Academia www.jobs.ac.uk/job/DSF021/l...

Lecturer in Law at University of Stirling

Recruiting now: Lecturer in Law on jobs.ac.uk. Click for details and explore more academic job opportunities on the top job board

jobs.ac.uk

"And so Arnold began reaching out to other people who said science was untrustworthy and giving them money." A MUST-READ post about open sci/metasci funding, philanthropist agendas, and academic censorship in the name of scientific reform. There's so much I want to quote. Better read it yourself!

Jeff Lockhart@jwlockhart.bsky.social · 5d ago

I wrote about science funding, science reform, and anti-science agendas. scatter.wordpress.com/2026/07/31/s...

In stage one we say nothing is going to happen. Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing. Stage three, we say maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can. Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it's too late now.

Holger Hestermeyer@hhesterm.bsky.social · 7d ago

Time and again climate change is treated as though it were binary: we cannot prevent it, so ok, it’s there let’s embrace it. That’s entirely wrong: it is a sliding scale. We cannot prevent 1.5 degrees. But maybe 3? Or 5?