Kris Nuttycombe

@nutty.land

Haskell, climbing, blacksmithing; occasional SCAdian, compiler-induced psychosis. I work on the core Zcash team at https://zodl.com and build software for worker-owned cooperatives at https://aftok.com by night. Signal: @nuttycom.01

My first reaction to Jev was, this is really interesting, and I immediately built it into my dagny.co side project. And this morning it occurred to me that having cheap classifiers built into everything is going to likely bring surveillance hell to every aspect of human life.

Dagny

dagny.co

Look, the Rationalist sex cult has a really simple explanation. If you're an insufferable dweeb, nobody's going to pay any attention. But if you're an insufferable dweeb _with a sex cult_, people will think maybe you're kind of cool.

I just think, of all the crazy ideas campaigns we've seen in this country that have succeeded or come close to succeeding, open borders isn't obviously nuts. Abolition, women's suffrage, gay marriage, the Civil Rights movement, ending the war on drugs. All of these had massive headwinds.

As the opposite of a computer toucher, I sometimes worry that I'm not keeping up with the development of things. Luckily, I'm smart enough to realize that if the "most dangerous" LLMs need warehouses full of GPUs to function, they can't just "break out" and start running on random PCs.

We won’t actually fix anything in the U.S. until we fix the voting system and get rid of first-past-the-post voting entirely. At best, we’ll get a temporary reprieve; whether we even get to undo any of the existing damage is an open question.

The goal on the Right has always been to preserve “sovereignty” understood as the right to use American power without restraint and to prevent outside forces to exert any kind of influence over U.S. politics and society – especially any kind of liberalizing, democratizing influence.

We need more than just policy reforms in response, we need a broader idea of the society we want to create to match the right’s vision of the hierarchical ethnostate, and we need a commitment to pluralistic democracy that matches their fury.

if you think that AI is not going to be able to augment the thing you're doing in whatever role you hold right now - whatever career path and profession - that is called cope that probably sucks for a lot of people! it sucked for me! but learning and adapting here really is key

hailey@hailey.at · last wk.

increasingly it seems like the only real answer to this is to find ways of ensuring guaranteed income for people. imo we are reaching a point where people who want to build or do things will be able to - unrestrained by skills - and there will be a lot of people who will no longer need to work

Discworld QOTD, from Thief of Time 'Every society needs a cry like that, but only in a very few do they come out with the complete, unvarnished version, which is “Remember-The-Atrocity-Committed-Against-Us-Last-Time-That-Will-Excuse-The-Atrocity-That-We’re-About-To-Commit-Today!"'

Micah@rincewind.run · 2w ago

Discworld QOTD, from The Light Fantastic “Unseen University had never admitted women, muttering something about problems with the plumbing, but the real reason was an unspoken dread that if women were allowed to mess around with magic they would probably be embarrassingly good at it…”

Saying AI is real and powerful and unlikely to go anywhere isn’t making a moral argument for it. In fact my point is, as I said earlier today, that we have to make our decisions about how to act morally in the context of a world in which AI simply exists, is powerful and isn’t going anywhere.

Many of you guys probably are too young to remember the late 1990s and early 2000s when the newspapers and media were full of conversations saying the internet wasn't really going to have any impact. Many of us who were actually engaged at the time knew how nuts that was.

The king says "ah, but I'm creative and can extract revenue that isn't called a tax. And, neat trick, now I can spend it on creating my own personal army that Parliament didn't authorize." This was fought out, 350 years ago. 4/

Money that comes into the United States government is government revenue. It is part of the public fisc. There's not "taxpayer money" and then "extra bonus money outside the rules." It's all taxpayer money. And spending *any* of it requires Congressional authorization. 2/

turns out making something high quality is still supremely fucking annoying. turns out computers still suck

25 years later and The Onion’s ParentCorner 9/11 explainer from immediately after the attack is a better understanding of the threat environment than the one produced by the U.S. government.

An Onion article titled “Talking to your child about the WTC attack,” which is filled with real good info.

the thing about vocally refusing to vote all the time is that politicians will, entirely logically, write you off as “those people who refuse to ever vote”

Evan and I will both be talking about this topic on a panel together at #Zcon7 in Cancún next month. @zfnd.org just released the full program schedule. I'm really looking forward to it! But if you can't make it in person, this post of hers is a pretty big component of our point. (Spoiler, I know.)

Evan Greer@evangreer.bsky.social · 2w ago

Age verification makes everyone less safe. Age verification makes everyone less safe. Age verification makes everyone less safe. Age verification makes everyone less safe. Age verification makes everyone less safe. Age verification makes everyone less safe.