Peter Tulip

@petertulip.bsky.social

Chief economist at Centre for Independent Studies

28 cooperative social housing apartments in Barcelona - would not be allowed in Australia due to so many building & fire regulations; - atrium roof/courtyard enclosure - lift combined with fire stair - exposed timber structure at GF - glazed timber doors & timber cladding to courtyard facades

BildBildBildBild

Canberra’s metro line - Australia’s best light rail project, now being extended, first through city centre to the lake front, & then hopefully to Woden. The remade & beautifully landscaped Northbourne Ave is the model for remaking Adelaide Ave as an urban boulevard - as the Griffins always intended.

BildBildBildBild

Australian cities are upzoning to allow for more apartments and townhouses, with the aim of getting more homes built. But policy makers need better tools to assess how effective these policies can be. It all starts with better understanding commercial feasibility. 🧵

Bild

The humble & affordable 3 storey walk up flats, so common in 60’s-80’s, can’t be built today; -no lift -needs sprinklers & pumps -slabs too thin -no thermal or acoustic insulation -parking non-compliant -windows too open List goes on & makes housing all the more expensive, esp what should be easy

Bild

Another paper (among many) finding that inclusionary zoning requirements backfire. In contrast, when I ask advocates of affordable housing requirements for evidence they cannot provide any.

Post nicht verfügbar.

The trickiest thing about arguing for more dense housing? Half the people who object say it’ll just be luxury housing for the rich. And the other half say you’re just building undesirable slums no one wants to live in.

We have known for decades that so-called “inclusionary zoning” is bad policy. Nonetheless, it is politically durable because it lets elected officials pose as friends of the poor while indulging their NIMBY constituents’ desire to block new housing in their neighborhoods.

Sam Alcorn@samalcorn.bsky.social · 5mo ago

The frustrating thing is that we’ve known about this for so long, and yet it continues, and in some places, is even growing. This paper was published by the Yale Law Journal when I was still in diapers (and I’m a middle-aged man with a half-white beard): openyls.law.yale.edu/server/api/c...

It's past time that the state government stepped in and prevented councils from weaponising heritage controls against housing. Not just preventing overreach like here in Willoughby. Across Sydney, but inner city councils ate the worst offenders by far

Willoughby map showing their plans to weaponise heritage against low and midrise housing

For decades, the loudest voices in planning were saying "No." We started YIMBY Melbourne to say "Yes." The Guardian credits that shift with driving a "planning policy revolution." Proof that when you show up with evidence & optimism, you can change policy!

Melbourne is in the middle of a housing revolution – have the yimbys already won?

Advocates say even they are surprised by Allan government’s embrace of higher density housing, but warn construction costs risk city becoming ‘victim of its success’

theguardian.com

We just relaunched our website! We've been around for a few years now and thought we should show off all the work our volunteers have been doing. New and improved with news stories, all our newsletters and every bit of advocacy we've done!

Greater Brisbane 🏗️🏢 Brisbane's YIMBY network

We're Greater Brisbane Urbanists, grassroots YIMBYs working to build a better, fairer city for everyone. Join us and help build abundant housing, better transport and walkable streets.

greaterbrisbane.org