Daniel S. Goldberg

@profgoldberg.bsky.social

Professor. Attorney, historian, public health ethicist. Always all ways public health. Jiujitsu🟤, Star Wars, Batman, Coffee. #LegalEpi #Stigma #PHLaw #PHEthx #Disability #HistPubHealth (all opinions mine) H/h/h. ✡️

New draft posted: The Collision of State Climate Tort Suits with Federal Deregulation, forthcoming in the Yale Law Journal Forum. This Essay examines the preemption arguments in the Suncor Energy v. Boulder case, which the Supreme Court will review in Oct. term 2026: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

The Collision of State Climate Tort Suits with Federal Deregulation

In its October 2026 term, the Supreme Court will review <i>Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder</i>, a tort case with significant implications for t

papers.ssrn.com

In case anyone wants to downplay the seriousness of diarrheal diseases... "Diarrhoea is a leading killer of children, accounting for approximately 9 per cent of all deaths among children under age 5 worldwide in 2021."

Diarrhoea - UNICEF DATA

Diarrhoea is a leading killer of children, accounting for approximately 9 per cent of all deaths among children under age 5 worldwide in 2021. This translates to over 1,200 young children dying each d...

data.unicef.org

I love jiujitsu -- it's by far the best mental health intervention I've ever found for most of my problems, but I will NEVER forget or forgive how poorly jiujitsu communities behaved during the worst part of the pandemic and the chud-to-decent person ratio is just unacceptable

I’ve seen in two culture /higher ed magazines recently the claim that the printing press engendered a crisis of authority at universities bc anyone could publish what they wanted and people could learn things without universities. This is not true.

I'm excited for the new Spiderman movie. I've loved every single 🕷️ movie. Unless you're #Xiennial or elder millennial, you can't imagine how excited we were for Tobey Maguire Spidey. Before then, superhero movies were terrible. But Sam Raimi was a gawd. We were SO excited & it didn't disappoint.

I don’t really want to get into this with people who feel this way, but i don’t think this is a good thing! We don’t need to behave this way! It’s not healthy to approach academic discourse as an exercise in harshness!

Screenshot of a post that reads “It's incredible is how little folks understand about academe. Peer review is brutal. Academic Q+A is Troy level slaughter. Bros attacking a lady academic for a fair review would shit themselves on stage after a paper and break down into toddler tears after their first conference paper w a mean Q+A.
12:35 PM • Aug 1, 2026 ® Everybody can reply
12 reposts 5 quotes 75 likes 1 save”

That said, while Warwick and James present us with a coherent account of the enterprise their historical actors were engaged in (they all had successful careers), I find it difficult to view the enterprise as such as a success.

It’s tiresome and pretty disappointing to see people say, “please, yes, critique the shit out of AIPAC and work against them, but don’t do it in a way that touches on centuries old, dangerous tropes” get ignored and/or argued with.

Another excellent quote. I come from a rabbinical family (Musar), and I've grown to be extremely skeptical of the function of "rabbi" itself. Teacher? Yes, sure. Faith leader? No idea what that means and to the extent I do I don't like or want it. Gatekeeper? Lol, no. Shabbat Shalom.

Congregational rabbis learned long ago that disapproval is not a strategy. It is a mood. It may make the disapprover feel principled, but it rarely produces Jewish commitment. A rabbi can glare at an intermarried couple from the moral heights of the bimah, and the couple will not respond by enrolling in Introduction to Judaism. They will simply leave.

They will find another synagogue, another movement, another religious community, or no community at all.
Daniel S. Goldberg@profgoldberg.bsky.social · 5d ago

This is excellent. "stop humiliating people in the name of a movement that has lost the moral confidence to explain what it believes." ... "The ? is not whether the family fits our imagined sociological model. The ? is whether we will help them build a Jewish life or watch them disappear."

This is excellent. "stop humiliating people in the name of a movement that has lost the moral confidence to explain what it believes." ... "The ? is not whether the family fits our imagined sociological model. The ? is whether we will help them build a Jewish life or watch them disappear."

Mark Copelovitch@mcopelov.bsky.social · 5d ago

It’s so awful. Welcome to 1996. A movement in shambles that probably isn’t salvageable at this point. This was very good: