Philip Purser-Hallard

@purserhallard.com

I write stuff -- most recently Sherlock Holmes: The Monster of the Mere. Posting about writing, TV, SF, Doctor Who, politics, language, crosswords, things I like, things I'm interested in, things. He/him.

The City and the City by China Miéville The Alteration by Kingsley Amis Hyperion by Dan Simmons The Mists of Avalon by Marion Zimmer Bradley Imperial Earth by Arthur C Clarke (allegedly). And, while deploring Gaiman, I still love most of his output.

BeijingPalmer@beijingpalmer.bsky.social · yesterday

alright let's do real discourse: five books *by bad people* that are still good or great books V.S. Naipaul, A BEND IN THE RIVER Allison Pearson, I DON'T KNOW HOW SHE DOES IT Kevin Myers, WATCHING THE DOOR Yukio Mishima, CONFESSIONS OF A MASK Neil Gaiman, BRIEF LIVES.

Early COVID mitigations showed us the power of collective action. The environment began to heal. People with disabilities were accommodated. An entire flu strain was eradicated. Folks reconnected with their local communities. We worked together & saved lives.

Yeah, I worry people will say this about me. I can be impatient and grumpy, and I don't like deliberate ignorance or unthinking acceptance of propaganda. I try not to be mean to people who are honestly dim but harmless, and I know I don't always succeed.

Justin Lewis@whenisbirths.bsky.social · 2d ago

One aim in life, although I'll never really know if I'll have achieved it, is to not have anyone at my funeral say 'didn't suffer fools'. I'm happy to suffer the odd fool here and there.

Seeing how celebrity deaths are treated on social media is weirdly sobering. Fortunately most of us won't have posters lining up to call us racist misogynist abusers, but we won't get the "Brought joy to millions, did tons of charity work and were always kind to strangers, 10/10" bit either.

more genuinely I do think actually being mean after someone awful dies is a social good, it reminds the living that you might not get karmic punishment in this life or the next, but that people will simply despise you and laugh at you and then forget you

Hello I have made this due to a mutual having issues with some folks on here forgetting this fact and shouting at him for it. Feel free to use it as a handy PSA x

A crappy photoshop paint image with a red star on blue, in comic sans is the message 'some people on the internet aren't American'

During the original Harry Potter boom, some librarians and academics expressed concern about kids wanting to read ONLY that. They were shouted down. "AT LEAST THEY ARE READING, THEY WILL GET A TASTE AND LOVE ALL READING SOON" Three decades on, I think we owe the librarians and academics an apology

I know I have quite a small reach on here but is there anyone on here who is a Doctor Who fan based in the South West? I have a lot of old stuff from my childhood and I’m looking to downsize, would like to pass as much of it onto a loving home if possible

I absolutely support the principle of paying creators for stuff, but it would be useful if people linking to paywalled content would briefly mention the fact, to save me clicking through, rejecting cookies, dismissing popups, getting a couple of paragraphs in and *then* discovering I can't read it.

4. It's essential for the long-term quality of human life that the majority of humanity take charge of said change, rather than a tiny elite imposing it on the rest of us in their own interests. 5. Our kids are going to have to deal with this if we don't.

Things I currently believe: 1. Human society in some form can easily survive the next 1,000 years. 2. Human society in its current form will not survive the next 50 years. 3. Catastrophic change is therefore inevitable.

The point isn't to simply acquit your client, the point is to drag rowling to court, and watch her personally squirm trying to explain that she didn't realize your client was telling the truth or expressing an honest opinion about her, and she didn't file charges in bad faith to avoid conviction.

If you can't do that, if you can't say "no, our researchers and employed experts have a right to express this opinion publicly, which we also think is merited and true, and it's abject nonsense that this could be construed as defamatory", then what good is your organisation?

Amnesty's capitulation is unacceptable, because a human rights NGO is not simply a discount think tank (viz. a double discounted research university). It's part of its job description to specifically leverage its resources to stand its ground against actual and threatened SLAPPs from bad actors!