Rebecca Sear

@rebeccasear.bsky.social

Director of the Centre for Culture and Evolution, Brunel University London @brunelcce.bsky.social https://www.rebeccasear.org/

The Center for Scientific Integrity is proud to announce the inaugural winners of the 2026 Ctrl-Z Award. Named for the universal keyboard shortcut for “undo,” the Ctrl-Z Award this year honors @cetaceanneeded.bsky.social and @katelaskowski.bsky.social for choosing transparency over reputation.

ScienceAdviser Exclusive: Meet the inaugural winners of the Ctrl Z Award

Today in Science and science: Ice age hunters’ penchant for female mammoths, a detailed vagal map, and more

science.org

“The tragic implication of Plümper and Neumayer’s analysis is not that individual scientists are unusually dishonest, but that a system designed to incentivise truth-seeking has been incrementally transformed into one that often rewards its distortion” blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofb...

Is publication, not truth, now the driving pursuit of science? - LSE Review of Books

The Credibility Crisis in Science by Thomas Plümper and Eric Neumayer explores how researcher incentives and publication bias distort scientific knowledge

blogs.lse.ac.uk

A globally invasive fish (actually a group of congeners) distributed through the pet trade and long established in North America continues to spread - and is becoming superabundant in various waterbodies on the continent. Its impacts have likely been underestimated. academic.oup.com/fisheries/ar...

The rise of goldfishes in North America

ABSTRACT. Goldfish Carassius auratus is a longstanding global invader that has entered a new phase in its invasion history, spreading into new geographical

academic.oup.com

Who's up for a good old fashioned (but short, bc I'm tired) paper thread? Thrilled to be in this special issue of Gender & Society (an absolute dream!), where we propose a feminist-inspired extension of how to theorize and model the spread of ideas in science + journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

What Gets Lost in Translation? Epistemic Tensions between Translation and Diffusion in Practice-Oriented Scholarship

Abstract
This paper proposes a feminist-informed metascience theory to explain the interconnected processes of idea creation, translation, and diffusion. Drawing on feminist critiques of science centered on perspective, power, and praxis, we develop a creation–diffusion model that jointly examines how ideas are created and then how the content of ideas influences their spread across academic fields. Using a nationally funded gender equity program as a case of a practice-oriented knowledge-production community, we analyze how gender equity research concepts were translated and diffused through the program-funded publications. We operationalize substantive engagement with gender equity research using word embeddings and Concept Mover’s Distance. Then, with additional contextual variables, we measure (1) the predictors of this engagement (ideas) and (2) the impact of engagement on citation counts and citation interdisciplinarity (the diffusion process) across social science and STEM fields. Our findings show that, in addition to context, the content of the idea matters for diffusion: Engagement with critical dimensions of gender equity research, such as feminism and structural concepts, diffused less often, whereas other dimensions, such as gender and methods, achieved broader uptake. Our empirical findings highlight the role of perspectives and epistemic power in shaping both knowledge production and diffusion. Our theoretical framework and methods demonstrate how metascience can incorporate feminist theory directly into diffusion studies, and why it should.
Mark Rubin@markrubin.bsky.social · 2w ago

Introduction to a special issue on feminist metascience and open science by Christin Munsch and @divreyes.bsky.social doi.org/10.1177/0891...

Abstract This introduction brings feminist scholarship into conversation with metascience and open science. Drawing on feminist epistemology, we argue scientific reform is not a neutral technical project. Rather, practices intended to improve rigor, transparency, and accessibility may also expose marginalized scholars and research participants to harm, reproduce inequality, and facilitate hostile scrutiny, particularly in the current political environment. These tensions point to the need for feminist metascience and feminist open science. We define feminist metascience as the study of how gender and intersecting relations of power shape the production, evaluation, circulation, and correction of scientific knowledge, and we define feminist open science as an approach to transparency that remains attentive to care, protection, and risk. We offer these definitions and the articles in this special issue as a starting point for larger conversations about how feminist scholarship might contribute to emerging debates over scientific reform.

This is simply wonderful news for the Migration Museum and its ongoing project to create the UK's first permanent museum exploring migration to and from the UK. The new Museum will be in the City of London, but is already working with collaborators outside London and outside England. 1/3

The Wolfson Foundation commits £600,000 to the UK’s ‘Missing Museum’

The Migration Museum is delighted to announce that The Wolfson Foundation has become a Founding Partner of the UK’s first permanent museum dedicated to exploring how the movement of people to and from...

migrationmuseum.org

A review of an important book on the history of racism in Romania."Cristian Cercel provides an in-depth reflection on Marius Turda’s new book În căutarea românului perfect...Turda aims to reveal the centrality of racialized thinking for the eugenics movement." ceureviewofbooks.com/longread/the...

The past and present of the history of racism in Romania - CEU Review of Books

Cristian Cercel provides an in-depth reflection on Marius Turda’s new book În căutarea românului perfect. Specific național, degenerare rasială și selecție socială în România modernă, published by Pol...

ceureviewofbooks.com

“These findings highlight the complex expression of women’s empowerment and illustrate how it unfolds unevenly across public and private domains, as well as across diverse sociocultural contexts” www.demographic-research.org/articles/vol...

Demographic Research - Heterogeneity in women’s public and private agency across sub-Saharan Africa (Volume 55 - Article 7 | Pages 223–274)

Volume 55 - Article 7 | Pages 223–274

demographic-research.org

This is both useful guidance (how to turn off AI summaries in Google), and also an important way to think. "it’s worth pushing past what you think you can accomplish. If something’s not working, don’t give up—try to figure out why. You might just fix it." buttondown.com/justinpot/ar...

How to turn off those AI summaries (and other thoughts)

Hi! This week I’m going to show you how to turn off Google’s AI feature, then talk a bit about why it’s fun to make things working How to get the old Google...

buttondown.com

I really need to turn off AI search in Chrome (which I never asked for in the first place). Did a quick search to find the link to a paper and it came up with this complete & utter nonsense. The paper in question was retracted because it used data which contain "substantial inaccuracies and biases"

AI overview after searching for a retracted paper:

The highly controversial 2010 study "Parasite prevalence and the worldwide distribution of cognitive ability" authored by Christopher Eppig, Corey L. Fincher, and Randy Thornhill was officially retracted by the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B on March 6, 2024.

The Retraction Overview
Original Publication: The paper was published online on June 30, 2010. It argued that regional variations in infectious disease stress dictated variations in national average IQ scores worldwide.

Reason for Retraction: The editorial team of Proceedings B issued the retraction after discovering major, unresolvable methodologies errors. “Following the publication of this article, Proceedings B was recently made aware of...” severe anomalies involving data duplication and inconsistencies that fundamentally invalidated the paper's original statistical conclusions.Additional text from the AI overview:

Key Data and Methodology Failures

Data Duplication: Investigation revealed that the authors inadvertently duplicated multiple blocks of data within their primary datasets.

Invalidated Conclusions: Correcting for these duplication errors entirely eliminated the statistical significance of their models, meaning "parasite stress" was no longer a viable statistical predictor of intelligence.

Lack of Access: The original raw data files were no longer completely accessible or verifiable by the journal, preventing any corrective corrigendum.

> On March 17, 1929, the Black sociologist W.E.B. Du Bois faced off against the white supremacist historian Lothrop Stoddard. The question under consideration: “Has the Negro the Same Intellectual Possibility as Other Races?” 1/n

The Men Who Believed Some Men Are More Equal Than Others (Gift Article)

In a new book, the historian Kim Phillips-Fein chronicles a “shadow tradition” of anti-egalitarians who fought against America’s founding ideals.

nytimes.com

Thinking through the unedifying, un-evidence-based rush to an undefined, apparently unmodelled paradigm of 'specialisation, what's being lost/threatened? Herts History was an excellent example of performing to a top standard in REF, but also much more than that. Questions to think with include: 1/4

Glen O'Hara@gsoh31.bsky.social · 3d ago

So it's farewell to the History subject area at the University of Hertfordshire, not the first nor the last to go. One of the best departments in the country, just extinguished like a snap of the fingers. Think of the waste. (1/2)

New paper out in our special collection on scientific racism: "Using the REED (Racial & Ethnic Equality & Diversity) Ecological Network as a case study, this paper examines how grassroots initiatives can advance racial and ethnic inclusion in academic and professional institutions"

A Four-Pillar Framework for Advancing Racial and Ethnic Inclusion in the Life Sciences | Evolutionary Human Sciences | Cambridge Core

A Four-Pillar Framework for Advancing Racial and Ethnic Inclusion in the Life Sciences

doi.org

Good to see pushback about the political neglect of UK universities, pushback about increasing regulatory requirements such as those around “free speech” and support for the importance of social sciences and humanities all in one interview

Ben Ansell@benansell.bsky.social · 4d ago

Glad someone senior from the sector is pushing back. Labour MPs need to understand the serious real anger from graduates and the people who produce them. And the dangerous financial situation they have allowed to fester, or indeed worsened, in one of Britain’s leading sectors.

Nature did a short piece on our preprint about how LLMs will affect the practice of science; my more detailed thread is below.

Scientists using LLMs will ‘do more, less well’, modelling study predicts

Research suggests that the combination of incentives to publish and the use of large language models will lead to more papers, but they will be less refined.

nature.com

Carl T. Bergstrom@carlbergstrom.com · 2w ago

1. We—@eduede.bsky.social, @mjcrockett.bsky.social, Kevin Gross, and I—have a new preprint on the arXiv today, based on ideas that emerged during an @sfiscience.bsky.social workshop in November 2024: The unintended consequences of large language models as a labor-augmenting technology in science.

"And so Arnold began reaching out to other people who said science was untrustworthy and giving them money." A MUST-READ post about open sci/metasci funding, philanthropist agendas, and academic censorship in the name of scientific reform. There's so much I want to quote. Better read it yourself!

Jeff Lockhart@jwlockhart.bsky.social · 5d ago

I wrote about science funding, science reform, and anti-science agendas. scatter.wordpress.com/2026/07/31/s...