Dr. Roberta Dollinger

@robertadolling1.bsky.social

PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. Postdoc at UW-SMPH | Formerly: PhD at Penn State.| Interests: transcription, epigenetics, promoter proximal pausing, cancer, languages, travel. Opinions are my own.

as a dad who has also been delayed getting home to Ithaca after a work trip that wasn't a lot of fun (although professionally successful), I greatly enjoyed the Odyssey

496,769 comments on the OMB proposed rule asserting numerous political interferences in government agency operations. Only about 53,000 have been posted but they skew massively (~94%) against the OMB proposals.

Bild

Still all quiet on the #NSF front. No new awards in the past week. REMINDER: We still are hearing of trickles of terminations, suspensions, and money being held back from grantees, which NSF isn't reporting. We need your help - please report! 🧪 grant-witness.us/posts/2026-0...

Noam Ross@noamross.net · 2mo ago

NSF seems to have stopped making new awards last week. There have been no new awards from any directorate since Weds, June 3. Even with the slow pace of new awards this year, there's been a consistent trickle. Something stopped the flow. grant-witness.us/funding_curv... #NSF 🧪

A line graph titled "Cumulative Number of Awards" tracking National Science Foundation (NSF) award dates from October through September across multiple fiscal years (FY 2021 to FY 2026). The x-axis shows months, and the y-axis shows the number of awards up to 11,000.

Lines for FY 2021 through FY 2024 cluster closely together, steadily climbing over the year to peak between 10,000 and 11,500 awards. The line for FY 2025 is noticeably lower, peaking under 9,000 awards.

The line for the current year, FY 2026 (shown in red), sits drastically lower than all previous years, tracking below 2,000 awards. A vertical line marks "June 3," where a pop-up box displays data for that date: FY 2021: 4,594; FY 2022: 4,983; FY 2023: 4,606; FY 2024: 4,234; FY 2025: 2,615; and FY 2026: 1,471. Past the June 3 vertical line, the red FY 2026 line completely flattens out, stopping abruptly at a dashed vertical line.

Important update: This morning NSF removed its internal flags on 3 of the 4 universities (Princeton's remains). We've updated our story to reflect this and the release of the new awards to Harvard and Duke.

Update: On 28 May, the day after this story was published, the NSF’s OAM removed from its database the note “Future Awards to Organization on Hold” for Duke, Harvard and Yale. And a few grants for researchers at Harvard and Duke have been released, according to agency staff members who spoke to Nature.

Yesterday—4 days after OMB released its proposal to revamp all federal funding—there were 3500+ comments. Today there are nearly 4,500. Our story on the damage the proposal could inflict on science and the researchers pushing back. Reported w/@marilenharo.bsky.social:

White House proposes vast overhaul of US science funding: what you need to know

The Trump administration’s proposal aims to improve transparency in federal funding, but critics fear the proposed rules would politicize research

nature.com

'Positions of “Health Scientist Administrator”' 'Positions of branch chief or division director' Health Scientist Administrators include #NIH program officers and scientific review officers (who run peer review). Branch chief/div. directors supervise program officers. This could be a bloodbath. 🧪

Positions of “Principal Deputy Director” under position
description number 00551682;
Positions of “Deputy Director for Intramural Research” under
position description number 00235547;
156
Positions of “Associate Director for Science Policy” under
position description number 00545751;
Positions of “Supervisory Public Health Analyst” under position
description number 00450091;
Positions of branch chief or division director that are
responsible for (1) influencing policy-making and budgetary
decisions over a portfolio of not less than in $20 million in
biomedical research grants, cooperative agreements, and/or
related funding mechanisms; and (2) formulating and
implementing program objectives, establishing funding
priorities, and exercising discretion in the allocation of
federal resources to advance Institute- and National Institutes
of Health-wide strategic goals.
Cole Donovan@colesci.bsky.social · 2mo ago

"And then things got worse." The complete Schedule P/C list, folks... This includes thousands and thousands of civil servants. To my eye, this covers more than just 15s.

📚 Librarians (especially those involved in professional orgs): this also covers IMLS, and includes an explicit ban on using federal grants to attend conferences except where specifically approved.

Chanda Prescod-Weinstein 🌌@chanda.blacksky.app · 2mo ago

NEW: A lot of bad has happened to American science over the last year but nothing comes even close to what’s about to happen if we don’t speak out in opposition to the OMB rule changes and I hope @aaas-socsci.bsky.social @apsphysics.bsky.social and others will launch public campaigns about this. 🧪🔭⚛️

I know there is a lot going on, and not all of this is new, but numerous aspects of this OMB proposal are highly alarming and would, if enacted, effectively force American scientists receiving federal funding (which is...most of them in some capacity or another) to stop engaging with the public.

elizabethginexi.bsky.social@elizabethginexi.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Summary of Key Changes in OMB’s Proposed Federal Financial Assistance Rule. Russell Vought is going destroy American Science. elizabethginexi.substack.com/p/summary-of...

Of all the harm this administration has done to US science, today's proposed changes to the way federal grants are awarded and administered is the most damaging yet. The text of the federal register document is impenetrably tedious by design, so here's an excellent summary of what it says.

elizabethginexi.bsky.social@elizabethginexi.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Summary of Key Changes in OMB’s Proposed Federal Financial Assistance Rule. Russell Vought is going destroy American Science. elizabethginexi.substack.com/p/summary-of...