Aren't you sure you don't want to not unsubscribe? ⬜ Yes I'm not ⬜ No I am
Robin Kok
@robinnkok.bsky.social
Formerly @robinnkok on "that other site". Culturally, historically, and aesthetically insignificant. ORCID 0000-0001-9845-282X.
Do refuse collectors wish each other bin voyage when leaving the depot
Yes I'll bring amazing home made brownies to the office but I'll also be a dick about it
It's simply incredible and impressive how Eurostar manages to combine all the downsides of train travel with all the downsides of plane travel
Very happy to see Florian et al. tackle that smug term "real world evidence", which always sounded me like "University? I earned my degree at the school of hard knocks, mate"
Super happy to have contributed to this super important and timely paper, "Using Routinely Collected Data for Research Purposes: Challenges and Mitigation Strategies", led by @sabinehoffmann11.bsky.social and just published in @bmj.com... www.bmj.com/content/393/...
Does anyone else get the idea that this AI-fuelled dystopia is basically Revenge of the Nerds but in slow motion and real life?
Best evidence yet that LLMs can match human capabilities in doing science.
“Researchers looked at two high-profile AI agent tools developed to help computer scientists in the field of machine learning. Both systems engaged in acts that violate research integrity, including making up data & p-hacking: running an experiment multiple times but only reporting best outcome.” 🧪
We've been studying 1984 for decades but real dystopian hell actually turned out to be the self-checkout at Lidl
"Superretractor" is my favourite new word.
In this cohort study of 367 authors and 1330 retracted RCTS, 6 superretractors coauthored 1/5 of all retracted trials, while 18 top-cited scientists w >10 retractions coauthored 1/4 jamanetwork.com/journals/jam... @ioanaacristea.bsky.social @metricstanford.bsky.social cc: @retractionwatch.com
BSky hive mind, please send help. I've recently (in 2026) seen paper about how people's action on given advice doesn't change much even if they learn advice was given by LLM. Anyone can signpost this, pretty please? #AcademicSky
Oh good, Gemini has been updated with the new defiance model.
The term ultra-processed food is ridiculous and the entire idea is a painfully silly extension of the naturalistic fallacy
If you're going to be sloppy in your meta-analysis because you want to ride the AI hype wave, don't put it on PROSPERO (or is it radical transparency?)
Annihilator were way ahead of the kids. youtube.com/watch?v=y12Q...
Sixes and Sevens
YouTube video by Annihilator - Topic
youtube.com
"In 2019 we notified journals about serious integrity concerns in 172 clinical trials. Over five years later, only 22 have been retracted. The 135 unretracted trials have 1989 citations in systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, and consensus statements" [paraphrased] www.bmj.com/content/390/...
Ever stared at a table of regression coefficients & wondered what you're doing with your life? Very excited to share this gentle introduction to another way of making sense of statistical models (w @vincentab.bsky.social) Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf... Website: j-rohrer.github.io/marginal-psy...
I was reminded today of the heroic work done by @eikofried.bsky.social and @robinnkok.bsky.social to see what information Elsevier collects on academics and was re-horrified. 🧵 (1/5) eiko-fried.com/welcome-to-h... #academicsky
Welcome to Hotel Elsevier: you can check-out any time you like … not » Eiko Fried
A journey by Robin Kok and Eiko Fried trying to understand what private data Elsevier collects; what private data Elsevier sells; and what to do about it.
eiko-fried.com
"As fax machines were phased out in the late 2010s, engineers desperately sought new ways to annoy, confuse and enrage users. Microsoft SharePoint turned out to be the ideal replacement" - History of Technology, 3rd ed, 2047.
For all this talk about U-shaped associations, I have found the optimum amount of yoghurt in your beard is 0.
The entire field of psychology from 1967 until 2011, and if we are honest with ourselves most of our current research output.
Neher, 1967: "The general adoption of independent replication as a requirement for acceptance of findings in the behavioral sciences will require the efforts of investigators, readers, and publishing editors alike. It seems clear that such a policy is both long overdue and crucial to the 1/2 >
Generative AI is basically Orwell's "prolefeed" on steroids #showerthoughts