Ruben C. Arslan

@ruben.the100.ci

Bayescurious evidence enthusiast at the100.ci Topics: evolution, ovulation, mutation, intelligence, personality, sexuality, R, open science & source tools. https://rubenarslan.github.io/

Also, a reminder that if you notice any factual errors I make in my published work, please tell me - I'll pay you a reward! I've found most of them myself so far, so I just donate extra instead. But I can't tell if this is because others haven't noticed them or are unwilling to tell me - please do!

About - Scientific Discovery

Tracing the steps towards scientific progress. Click to read Scientific Discovery, by Saloni Dattani, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers.

scientificdiscovery.dev

New preprint w/ Leo Tiokhin & @lakens.bsky.social! Registered Reports (RRs) are great for science b/c publication is guaranteed before results are known, reducing publication bias & QRPs. This feature supposedly also makes them great for *scientists*. But is that really true? 1/ tinyurl.com/4sy993rr

Career incentives make Registered Reports unattractive under realistic academic conditions

Registered Reports are a publication format designed to reduce publication bias by guaranteeing publication before results are known. This guarantee is considered attractive in the prevailing ‘publish...

tinyurl.com

Yet the effects on morphological differences are HUGE. I'm talking p = 2.1 × 10⁻⁵⁴. This alone should raise a giant red flag: How can the downstream effects of alcohol availability be several dozens of magnitudes larger than the upstream effects? 4/N

Bild

7/🧵 Here's what a full RegCheck workflow looks like from scratch - including linking a registration directly from OSF, and navigating the RegCheck report. Completed end-to-end in about 5 minutes in real time.

6/🧵 But our goal with RegCheck has always been to facilitate human comparisons. To this end, we now also include the 'Evidence' viewer: where you can view documents side-by-side, with the specific quotes from the documents highlighted in-context.

Bild

Looks like a cool analysis, but note that it excludes preprints that were never published. So this last sentence in the abstract amounts to ‘conditioning on preprints accepted by the scientific community, preprints are good enough to be accepted by the scientific community’.

Bild
Hao Yin@haoyin.bsky.social · 3w ago

Nature News covered our preprint on LLM analysis of Preprint-to-Publication transition 😆👇 Think preprints are unreliable? Analysis of 70,000 studies might change your mind www.nature.com/articles/d41... Kudos to @rrust.bsky.social for leading this project👍 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

Is it time to tell the biological aging clocks people about the age-period-cohort problem or are they still busy overfitting breakpoint regressions in tiny cross-sectional convenience samples?

I don't know how people can look at this and think to themselves "that seems plausible" (rather than e.g., maybe this is an artefact of participation into the samples) Demographers, have you ever seen a health trend over age that looks like this?

A line chart showing the rate of aging according to 'biological clock' measures, except it looks like a roller coaster.

Our department just announced a new Associate Professor position in quantitative research methodology 🇳🇴 One of the favorable qualifications is experience with open science practices + R/Python experience www.jobbnorge.no/en/available...

Associate Professor in Quantitative Research Methodology (302697) | University of Oslo

Job title: Associate Professor in Quantitative Research Methodology (302697), Employer: University of Oslo, Deadline: Tuesday, September 1, 2026

jobbnorge.no