Dr. Sandra Duffy Golden

@sandraduffy.bsky.social

Senior lecturer in law, dog parent, immigrant Bristolian, Irish. Book on queer/trans law reform and coloniality out this year. They/she. Fond of penguins. Views personal, not employer's. 🇵🇸 Header: @mxfrankduffy.bsky.social eireannach.ghost.io

Something about EHRC Guidance/Supreme Court Ruling I've been thinking about is how slow and incremental this implementation's been because we've been so vocally resistive, generating the political hesitancy from the Govt + Commission, but that also has increased the waiting-uncertainty of it all

Once safe, write down the time, place, names, descriptions and exact words used. Keep receipts, photographs, messages or witness details where available. Consider making a written complaint to the venue afterwards.

If the situation feels unsafe Leave if you can do so safely. Move towards staff, friends, security or a busy public area. Do not stay to win the argument. Call 999 if you are threatened, trapped or in immediate danger.

When the in group are told they can Other someone based on their feelings, this is what you get. "I dont want to be near the trans woman/i dont want a brown nurse/i have the right not to see queers/ban the book" etc etc Policing toilets is part of the same bigotry as demanding white doctors.

I need to write a little thing to my trans volunteer group about the EHRC guidance basically saying, y'know, please don't worry too much about this despite what you might hear today, etc, but all that's coming out when I start drafting is 'loud and garbled scream of frustration.'

Calling it a bubble is to miss the point. Go to where a community suits you, and where you suit the community. Where you can get what you want. I don’t want fights any more. I want facts, freedom and fun - peppered with interesting information. Is that a bubble? Maybe, but a good one. 4/4

What I love about Bluesky is what I loved about old Twitter: if I want to find out about something (however recondite) there will be someone here (often with a PhD in it) and the time and patience to share their knowledge. /1

There's something really annoying about being an under-writer. When you look at something you've said in 500 words and you know that in order to not get the review 'too short' from Reviewer 2, you have to bulk it out with the equivalent of rhetorical lentils in a stew.

"Detail is itself a kind of argument and thus, since beauty and elegance in writing derive from economy, a way of making a point without belabouring it." Hell yes. Great piece, it's going straight into the kit for advanced students and when doing writing training.

Royal Historical Society@royalhistsoc.org · 5d ago

"Details, in their singularity and idiosyncrasy, point to the capaciousness of human experience." New today in the Society's journal 'Transactions': Joe Moran 'On Detail in Historical Writing': bit.ly/44UMi8C Now available OA @joemoransblog.bsky.social @massobsarchive.bsky.social #Skystorians 1/2

Opening page of the Transactions article 'On Detail in Historical Writing' by Joe Moran. 

Full abstract: "This Comment considers the role of detail in historical writing, inflected through my own experience of writing ‘trade’ books for a general rather than specialist readership. I argue for the value of the detail that is slightly recalcitrant, that is more than just flesh on the bones of an argument or evidence marshalled to make a point. Detail is itself a kind of argument and thus, since beauty and elegance in writing derive from economy, a way of making a point without belabouring it. The gratuitous fact can be seductive, suggesting that the world has a randomness and overabundance that can't easily be rounded up into a dataset. Details, in their singularity and idiosyncrasy, point to the capaciousness of human experience. They correct our tendency to fixate on one story, to focus on the eventful at the expense of the marginal, and to invent a false unity of experience that erases social differences. With their obdurate specificity, they can shatter our presumptions about the past. I explore these ideas with reference to modern literature (Flaubert, Chekhov), the Mass-Observation archive and examples from my own work in contemporary cultural history and family history."

One final take: The people doing the hard yards of effective work, whether grassroots activism, legal work or lobbying, do not talk much on here about it. Because it’s difficult, exhausting interpretations are too bad faith, and the other side can see your posts. Bluesky is not the real world.

As of 1 August, I'm officially a 'Reader', which is the first time my job description actually describes *me*... I imagine this is how a younger version of my son might feel should be become a fire engine when he grows up.

I was saying to my manager the other day that I need to write something 'boring and generalist' in law instead of doing fun gender theory stuff. So naturally I've decided to write a legal philosophy paper about ghosts and catapult it at a massive journal, because ADHD chaos demon before all else.