Kate Bowles

@sokate.bsky.social

Exploring experience design for uncertain situations. Higher education sceptic. Climate worrier. Mostly over at aus.social.

From journal editing experience this tracks. In 2022 our journal got ~300 submissions. In 2025? 1300. So far this year? 500 and we're not even out of April yet. The AI trickle is now a stream, yet T&F are *still* seeking new big tech partners to flog papers for AI training rather than *helping us*

Margot Finn@eicathomefinn.bsky.social · 3mo ago

'Annual reports for Elsevier and Springer Nature show publications were up 10 per cent and 11 per cent, respectively, with submissions up 20 per cent and 34 per cent.... [for Wiley] publications were up by 11 per cent and submissions by 26 per cent. 1/3

"Why aren't media as outraged about the Perth bomb attack as there were over the Bondi shootings?" Dude, they aren't even as outraged as they were when Adam Goodes threw an imaginary boomerang.

It’s good to feel a bit of time to slow down & appreciate the people we love, the people who shape us, the people we miss, people who maybe aren't around any more. Maybe some nostalgia for times gone by. A sense of knowing, amidst all the noise, that it’s our relationships that matter.

Albanese? Wong? Anything to say about anything? I know we just learned that AUKUS is beyond him, and I know we’re very keen to say we have no doubt they would defend us under ANZUS, but is this the moral quality of the ally we are choosing, or just the one we’re afraid of losing?

People who condemn well-intentioned approaches to diversity, equity, and inclusion out of hand are presuming their so-called "meritocracy" operates on a level playing-field. Such an argument entirely misses the point that prevailing sources of money, power, and privilege dominate.

Australian universities need to be thinking seriously about this question of social license. It’s not new, it’s just got a new hat. And it’s going to pop up everywhere in the election year. A smart defense will need to go beyond stock images of sciencing. futurecampus.com.au/2025/01/23/h...

HE’s hottest topic emerges - Future Campus

As US higher education institutions brace for the Trump administration’s promised reforms, designed to radically reshape the sector to better align with the values of their supporter base, the importa...

futurecampus.com.au

One of the early panel discussions I did on Generative AI turned to the question of labour saving for faculty. A big topic was taking on the writing that no one wants to do or read anyway. The specific example was reporting out on sabbaticals and grants. Why not automate that hoop with ChatGPT?

Overheard yesterday in small independent local bookstore. “My son told me the name of the book and I’ve forgotten it.” Long pause. All of us browsing held our breath. “Percy something?” “Oh yes, we have those, which one?” I’m surprised we didn’t all cheer, as we were thinking it.

Debbie Northway 🇦🇺🦘🐨@debbienorthway.bsky.social · 2y ago

More than “It’s blue and I saw it on my Grandma’s book shelf about 32 years ago. No, I don’t know what it’s about, but I think the author died about 17 years ago”. Yes, I’ve been a bookseller at Christmas.

The UK's HSE in its reply to the University of Birmingham SMT's response to Birmingham UCU's complaint: 'I do not consider that your reply provides sufficient assurance that work-related stress is being suitably managed by the University'. 'we will be inspecting the University [..] in the new year'

Date: 13 December 2024
Dear Professor Tickell,
RE: Concerns about the Management of Work-related Stress
Thank you for your reply sent on 16 September 2024, I have considered the contents and discussed it
with colleagues.
The outcome being that I do not consider that your reply provides sufficient assurance that work-related
stress is being suitably managed by the University. This is because almost all your stated control
measures are tertiary, or lagging measures, that deal with stress once it has become a problem. For
instance, tracking the reasons why your employees access the employee assist programme, and your
staff survey being a lagging measure of the University’s performance.
I have considered your offer to get in touch if I have further queries, but I do not think further
correspondence will be sufficient and as a result we will be inspecting the University’s management of
work-related stress in the new year.
Can you please provide a point of contact by Friday 10 January 2025, so that we can obtain a better
understanding of the organisational structure, your management arrangements, and processes before
undertaking the inspection.
Section 28(8) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 requires me to inform your employees
about matters affecting their health and safety. As such, I have sent a copy of this letter to the
University and College Union as a representative of your employees.
Yours sincerely
Harvey Wild
Head of Operations
Inspection Division
cc Cheryl Rogers, Head of Health and Safety Services
University and College Union

The name of this product is the red flag for the conversations higher education is failing to have about its own labour market. The business problem being solved here isn’t the workload of the privileged, that’s just bait. www.alldayta.com

All Day TA

All Day TA is an AI EdTech company focused on higher education that enables professors to build customized AI teaching assistants for their courses. Available 24/7, it provides students with instant, ...

alldayta.com

As the remaining Bali 9 members return home, ALHR’s thoughts are with the loved ones of Andrew Chan & Myuran Sukumaran - young men who had been demonstrably rehabilitated after 10 years imprisonment but who were executed. We must continue to work towards the worldwide abolition of the death penalty

irreversible.is

Mike Carlton@mikecarlton01.bsky.social · 2y ago

This is great news. They must be in their late 30s, early 40s now. They should never have been shopped by the AFP…

I dream of a world where instead of saying “hey, AI can write this grant exit report no one wants to read” we ask “what is a more meaningful way to report out about grants?” We automate busy work instead of abolishing it and boil the oceans in the process.

“professional incentives” is the thing to notice. Why have universities incentivised fast and frequent paywalled publication? What metrics of individual and institutional gain/game have made higher education so ripe for AI uplift? Looking forward to what Mark has to say.

Post nicht verfügbar.

1. It’s not possible to keep “AI” out of “the humanities” so long as the humanities inhabit an institution. 2. AI is first/foremost an amplification of—the operationalization of—long-standing forces acting on (within) that institution. 3. It’s not about the technology. It’s about the capital.