Steph Paton

@stephpaton.bsky.social

Glasgow left journo writing about politics, LGBTQ+ liberation and environmentalism. Columnist for @ScotNational. They/Them 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈 Views are mine etc.

Sex Matters has lost a challenge today against the National Police Chief's Council and British Transport Police. With another High Court judgment expected at 2PM on whether or not the PATHWAYS puberty blocker trial should go ahead, let's hope GC activists go two for two on publicly failing.

I find the idea that any lawful viewpoint must be platformed just a wild approach to public policy. GC beliefs are protected in the same breath as being against gay marriage, it’s the same principle. Does it mean any event they apply to must under all circs put on a panel for them to espouse that?

Aidan Comerford@aidancomerford.bsky.social · 6d ago

Make no mistake, what the "gender critical" movement wanted was to force Féile Belfast into compliance through lawfare. That is their modus operandi when it comes to dealing with any org that shows a scintilla of support for trans people. They lost this time, and they're struggling to cope with it.

Tweet by Heather Binning, founding member of the so-called "Women's Rights Network." 

I am disappointed but not surprised that the men of the Feile team took to social media to gloat and crow about their intransigence. There was no win for them and representing it that way is disingenuous. 

WRN wished for Feile to WANT to reinstate our panel discussion rather than be FORCED to. 

However despite cancelling our event, Feile provided us with a platform far bigger than merely west Belfast to get our message heard across Northern Ireland and further afield.  Conversations about whether women have the right to speak openly and honestly, about whether a publicly funded organisation - regardless of its origins - should ensure it represents ALL lawful viewpoints and experiences, and demonstrate for the world to see just exactly who is trying to marginalise who here.  

Who knew women were such a threat! 

Respect, rights and reality - I’ll buy you a dictionary.

The anti-trans group LGB Alliance posted this to Twitter, and I find it genuinely funny. Once you read the methodology section on their survey, it's clear that this survey only tells you that people who already support this group... agree with the group.

LGB Alliance "We surveyed lesbian, gay and bisexual people. 94% felt uncomfortable being categorized under the LGBTQ+ umbrella. 87% felt uncomfortable being categorised as "queer.""SURVEY METHODS
Sample: On 4th May 2023, a link to a Google Form survey was emailed to 7,021
LGB Alliance supporters. These were individuals who subscribed to the LGB Alliance
newsletter, had attended one or more LGB Alliance events or who had made
donations to the charity.
2,133 responses were received. This response rate of 30% is reasonable for a survey
of this type.
Questionnaire and screening: The landing page explained the survey was for
lesbian, gay and bisexual supporters of LGB Alliance. The aims were described as,
‘to help us understand the attitudes that LGB Alliance supporters have around common
terms used to categorise LGB people. The findings of this survey will help us advocate
more effectively for the needs of LGB people.’ It was explained that the survey would
be kept confidential in accordance with GDPR, and that their personal information
is protected by law. A contact email was provided for those who wanted more
information.
The first two questions were screening questions. Non-supporters were screened
out at Q1: ‘This survey is for LGB supporters of LGB Alliance. Before we start the survey,
can you confirm you are a supporter of LGB Alliance?’ Those who indicated they were
not a supporter, didn’t know, or preferred not to say were screened out. A scan of
responses to the open-ended questions suggested there were a tiny number of
individuals who appeared to be detractors rather than supporters of LGB Alliance
who continued with the survey. All those who answered ‘yes’ at Q1 were included
in the analysis as they would not have altered the results due to their very small
numbers.
Q2 screened out those who were supporters of LGB Alliance but who we

'Labour have long owed an apology to the public for defending Israel’s campaign of murder and terror against the Palestinian people since 2023. And despite widespread reporting to the contrary, I’m not convinced we’ve had one yet.' www.thenational.scot/politics/262...

Andy Burnham’s 'sorry' on Labour support for Israel isn’t a real apology at all

LABOUR have long owed an apology to the public for defending Israel’s campaign of murder and terror against the Palestinian people since 2023. And…

thenational.scot

Our investigation caught Shivat Zion on camera offering to help UK citizens move to an illegal Israeli settlement. Shivat Zion were then photographed at an event in London. The government has still not imposed sanctions on the Israeli group. www.declassifieduk.org/uk-politicia...

UK politicians call for sanctions on Israeli charity

Demands follow Declassified investigation, which revealed how Shivat Zion touted ‘awesome’ illegal settlements

declassifieduk.org

A trans girl in the UK will face consistent messages she's not accepted & doesn't belong from a young age. Toilet segregation, banned from sports, banned from Brownies, denied healthcare. school's free to outright deny her identity. Treated literally as subhuman. Because of Labour.

Clive Lewis MP@labourlewis.bsky.social · 4w ago

All sexualities, genders and cultures should be free to celebrate their identity in our public spaces. The fact that county councillors think their priority should be denying this shows everything we need to know about Reform in power.

Saying that Labour "didn't get it right" doesn't quite do justice in describing his party's financial, political and military support for a genocidal regime though, does it?

Headline: Andy Burnham apologises for Labour's stance on Gaza and says it didn't get it right

This will damage relationships, damage attendance and attainment, cause some children to drop out. It is "safeguarding" guidance that will directly harm a vulnerable minority of children. Trans children deserve so much better than this.

Kate Forbes going off to speak at the far-right ARC conference is a great reminder that one bigotry is never that far from another - a fact that was denied by her defenders when her views were first revealed.