Stefan Theil

@stheil.bsky.social

Public law, human rights, & constitutions at Cambridge, Fellow of Sidney Sussex College: www.law.cam.ac.uk/people/academic/s-theil/6578 Current research on free expression and doctrinal methods. Book: Towards the Environmental Minimum.

It is really difficult to imagine something that is more clearly in the national interest (regardless of your political outlook) than the longterm viability of human life on the planet. Climate change is an existential risk to all of us and future generations. 1/n

Lewis Graham@lewisgrahamlaw.bsky.social · 4w ago

For those interested, here is the report: policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/u... The PolEx authors advocate for ignoring the ICJ’s climate opinion and withdrawing from the ICJ’s jurisdiction altogether. Endorsements from judicial figures including Lords Burnett and Sumption, who should know better

🚨 WATCH: Nigel Farage threatens a Sky News journalist who asks about his undeclared gifts from convicted criminal George Cottrell "You harass my family anymore, there will be serious consequences"

It is not a easy ban to enforce, many of the crucial details still need to be figured out - but all in all, this seems like a positive step. Social media has its benefits but the balance sheet is decidedly negative for society. The less we rely on it, the better. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

When will social media ban start, and which platforms are affected?

The measures will see apps including TikTok and Snapchat blocked for UK teens early in 2027.

bbc.co.uk

"Speech" is an action. It is an action like riding a bicycle, selling fish, or baking bread. If someone invoked "freedom of action" as a reason for not regulating a harmful activity, we'd see straight through it. Speech can be just as harmful as any other activity. /1

This is bordering on outsourcing your thinking to a chat bot. You learn stuff by researching and reading the source material yourself and thinking about it - not by letting someone else summarise (allegedly) salient sources. The fact that it is a probabilistic text predictor doesn't make it better.

SpinningHugo@spinninghugo.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I'm working on a big project with lots of citations. AI can check the accuracy of every citation I've used, and then create a list of cases, statutes and articles across several jurisdicitions that don't appear on the topic, and give me a summary of each for me to read and check. In 45 seconds /3

Also the people reclaiming Dworkin today are — ironically enough — Vermeule and co. Which shows that as an interpretive strategy, it’s pretty weak and easily contorted into something Dworking would have hated. Too bad for him.

Four years into a wade of imperialist aggression they clearly intended to last weeks at most, the Russian government has bought death and misery to hundreds of thousands for nothing.

The lawyering skills on display from all of these people is shockingly poor. What should a judgment of a court on an issue like this look like? Start with a brief outline of the facts. Then quote in full the text relied on for the power. Then interpret the text. Not here. /1

SpinningHugo@spinninghugo.bsky.social · 6mo ago

Settling down for some delicious lawyering. Let us see how the three resisted the bleeding obvious. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...

After the first few weeks, when everything was cancelled, the COVID years were horrendously busy. I can still remember crying when trying to upload online lectures Of course it was a shit time for students, but universities didn't choose lock down and weren't doing online teaching for fun.

Grumpy Philosopher@stevecooke.org · 6mo ago

During the pandemic, I rewrote my content for online delivery, learned a whole new set of skills for remote teaching, & paid for the tech to provide the best experience to students out of my own pocket, while struggling with caring for a family & suffering from Covid. So yeah, see below.

Great stuff from Mark here as usual - well worth your time! Not the biggest fan of a JR theory based (mostly) on ultra vires and voidness ab initio (imho,it struggles with non-statutory powers and common law) but undeniably convincing framework for the PA case, highlighting shortcomings on remedies.

Mark Elliott@profmarkelliott.bsky.social · 6mo ago

In a new post on the Palestine Action case, I ask whether, given the High Court's conclusion that proscription was unlawful, the Metropolitan Police is right to say that the organisation remains a proscribed one. publiclawforeveryone.com/2026/02/17/i...

Completely unoriginal thought but: it's frustrating that the actual experience of living in large cosmopolitan multicultural city (London Uk in my case) is actually pretty dope, but a lot of politics is organised around this being a nightmare scenario that must be apologised for and avoided.

Your periodic reminder that the *blatantly illegal* use of force by great powers does not mean that: (a) international law, or more specifically the prohibition on the use of force is dead, or (b) that international law is a pointless endeavour. 1/2