@tmoney2007.bsky.social

This birthright ruling is why I just refuse to tolerate all the Democrat garment rending over NY voters choosing progressive candidates. They are incapable of governing in this moment. The politics of appeasement and centrism gets us to a 5-4 decision on the constitutional question.

With this ruling, the birthright issue is not going away. The right hasn't really begun *organizing* around getting rid of the citizenship clause. Like Roe, this will be their fight for a generation. And if the Democrats just say "we won" and ignore it, like Roe, the Republicans will eventually win.

"The United States draws its SPR; the world prices off the suppressed signal. When Cushing hits its operational floor — a matter of weeks at current trajectories — the self-correcting mechanism arrives not gradually but abruptly." Sounds bad. www.carlyle.com/carlyle-comp...

The abundance illusion

Jeff Currie suggests that markets are mistaking temporary relief from Chinese demand flexibility and strategic inventory drawdowns for a lasting improvement in global energy supply, which is underpric...

carlyle.com

My main opinion on the ME Senate/Platner Discourse is that we need 25 SCOTUS justices, 300 Senators in a subordinated Senate, & a massively larger House with PR & multi-member districts. But in the meantime, "Nazi tattoos should be disqualifying in the Democratic Party" is a good starting point.

Mark Copelovitch@mcopelov.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Look, if we had minimally serious political institutions in 🇺🇸, “Who represents the 42nd largest state in the upper house of parliament?” would not be a question of national importance, much like “who is the 5th vote on the constitutional court?” would also not be. Alas, we don’t live in that world.

There's a huge lane for Dems to run on anticorruption in 2028, but I also think they would do well to take a look at what Zohran's doing with efficiency in NYC as a counter to this. Most people don't think that the federal government is doing fraud, they think it's wasteful.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 3mo ago

JD Vance: "You gotta be willing to look at all fraud, or you're never gonna be able to look at the high level guys. Very often what happens is you've got 10 people who are skimming $1m off the top, then they kick back a few hundred thousand to somebody above them."

Today is a reminder that except for a brief period running roughly from Brown v. Board to Roe v. Wade, throughout its history the Supreme Court has been a reactionary force protecting the wealth of the wealthy and the power of the powerful, almost always hostile to equality and justice.

If he's going to get a national profile on the strength of a younger woman's campaign, I'm going to come out and say it: during his short-lived tenure as a math professor, Biss had an inappropriate romantic relationship with one of his undergraduate students. I was that student.

NPR@npr.org · 5mo ago

The push for generational change in the Democratic Party faces a test in a Chicago-area congressional district, where the top candidates span three generations: from Gen X and millennials to Gen Z. n.pr/3PD5bZ6