Tom Darby

@tom.hitlst.io

Building HITLst: process on rails for human-agent dev teams. The thing where agents do the work and you still ship something good. → hitlst.org

Wait, you… use libraries? Code that other people wrote for you? You just… download it? Do you even read the code? Do you not care about the craft, the knowledge that comes from putting in the work yourself? Aren’t you afraid your skills will atrophy?

It’s not the typing func doThing(blah blah) that does it for me, its the knowing that the interlocking components work in just the right way to make everything else hum along nicely. In other words, I do understand the magic of the machine. No coding required anymore.

I spent decades of my life loving the craft of writing the best code, priding myself in generally being regarded as pretty good at what I do. LLMs gave me a bit of a forced perspective shift that taught me what I really enjoy is the building of the system, the architecting of how it’s going to work.

LaurieWired@lauriewired.bsky.social · 3w ago

Don’t you *LIKE* understanding the magic of the machine? You do realize hand-programming (I hate that I even have to specify hand now) is fun…right?

As someone who is NOT a coder, I've spent the last two weeks building some things from scratch using Claude and Python. I know this is a somewhat controversial take, but for people with my skill set, it rounds me out somewhat and it has been amazing.

Didn’t get much time to work on HITLst this weekend, but Fable was able to put enough well-scoped work together before they got zapped that I could let Opus chug through the backlog relatively unsupervised

The Fable/Mythos news tonight is…not good. If this is the response now, what’ll it be in a few years when you can run an open model as powerful as Fable on your own hardware?

So much of effective use of AI coding tools is managing your own cognitive load. Learning where to focus your attention and where to trust the machine to know what it’s doing is probably the biggest factor in successfully using these tools. If you don’t, the volume of code will overwhelm you.

alright, Fable is sick. It *just* gets what i mean went through some kind of complex design, off-the-beaten-path, and it one shot implemented in 40 min with a workflow to check its work and it did the right amount. Not too much, not too little. And it works, very well

OK, second evening of working with Fable 5, and I'm even more impressed. Given very general guidance–no more than a paragraph worth of text–Fable has been able to identify meaningful gaps in HITLst's UX, *and* propose and implement clear, easy-to-use solutions. Fable is a huge leap forward.

Oh, also: Fable 5 will absolutely *BURN* through tokens, but it's doing this as an orchestrator, not as the core model. Fable just launched five separate subagents to tackle five issues in parallel, which burned through roughly half of my Max 5x session quota in 15-20 minutes...

Gut reaction to my first evening's use of Fable 5: It's been doing some fairly deep dives for me tonight and has turned up things that Opus hadn't. I'm sure some of this is iterative improvements, but the overall experience feels both more effective and focused. Also, it sounds more professional.

I used it to make a homebridge plugin cuz there weren’t any great solutions to adding a state monitoring + on/off switch for my NAS to HomeKit. Total non-coder, was surprised the exercise actually yielded a positive result

Yup. In 1 hour and 250k tokens, Claude cleaned up, organized, pruned, updated and finished implementing a Homebridge install I’d spent *weeks* trying to do myself. Everything works now, runs with the lid closed, auto-reboots and launches on power failure, no more terminal windows…everything. 😙🤌