Marcos Fanton

@tomecicuta.bsky.social

Professor de Filosofia na UFSM/Brasil. Me interesso por um pouco de tudo: modelos e mecanismos em filosofia da ciência, opressão e injustiça estrutural em filosofia social , análise estatística e programação em R em epidemiologia e +

🚨Update: Our analysis of global APC expenditure has now been expanded to cover more publishers (7 -> 14) and more years (2019-2025). We estimate $15B in APCs paid over seven years, $3.7B in 2025 alone. Elsevier crosses the $1B threshold by itself in 2025. arxiv.org/abs/2608.16322 #ScholComm

Line chart showing 5 biggest publishers from 2019-2025
Eric Schares@eschares.bsky.social · 2y ago

🚨 Preprint! We combine our recent open dataset of #APC prices with the article counts per journal-year from #OpenAlex to estimate how much the academic community has paid in APCs over the last 5 years. A. $8.349 billion ($8.968 B in 2023 USD) $2.5B in 2023 alone. arxiv.org/abs/2407.16551 #metasci

Divisão de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Chicago baniu o uso de IA tanto por alunos quanto por professores, além de proibir o uso de dispositivos eletrônicos em sala de aula. Dada a influência da instituição nas humanidades e ciências sociais, a decisão tende (eu espero e torço) a repercutir.

Social sciences (sosc) Core classes will generally prohibit the use of technology in class and ban the use of artificial intelligence tools by students and instructors beginning this fall, according to a Social Sciences Collegiate Division (SSCD) memo obtained by the Maroon.
The guidance, issued by SSCD Master Jenny Trinitapoli in consultation with sequence chairs and instructors, reflects a "strong consensus... that our sequences are best understood as a pedagogical setting without AI," the memo reads. "Although practices have varied course-by-course in recent years, in AY 2027 sequences are collectively designed to be taught as 'analog' courses."
Under the new guidelines, students will primarily read texts on paper and engage with them via device-free guided discussions, in contrast to previous years, when technology policies were left to the discretion of instructors, with many permitting the use of laptops and digital texts in class.
"[I]n the SOSC Core we first equip students to read, write, and think without dependence on AL, just as we equip students to read, write, and think beyond the bounds of conventional views or leading ideologies," the memo reads.

“This paper explores the evolution of hereditarianism in its various forms, examining its connections to racism and anti-egalitarian politics. A consistent theme is the belief in the potential for genetic explanations of social inequalities both within and between groups”

Hereditarianism: a century of the science of inequality - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences

Hereditarianism, the belief that genetic factors significantly influence differences in behavioral traits and social outcomes, remains relevant in the age of polygenic embryo screening and social scie...

link.springer.com

Amnesty International put out a major report documenting the influence of UK based anti trans gender critical organizations and their funding. Within hours, GC groups threatened defamation lawsuits and Amnesty was forced to pull it down. Proving the point they're anti rights. Anyways, here it is.

BildBildBildBild

As philosophy rushes to claim expertise on AI, AI companies rush to control the philosophical narrative. Unlike other disciplines, philosophy has no standards for reporting conflicts of interest. This petition endeavors to change that: docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

Open Letter about Industry Funding and Disclosure in Philosophy

*For full list of signatories, updated every few hours, please click here.* In recent years, philosophical writing on areas such as climate change, technology, misinformation, and artificial intellige...

docs.google.com

When utilized in literature review, LLMs consistently 1. fail to mention female authors in female-led literatures, 2. insist that men are more influential or more heavily cited when this is contradicted by objective citation counts, and 3. attribute women’s work to hallucinated male scholars.