peterVG

@vangarderen.net

archivist + tech | https://arkrim.tech

OK, I wrote up a whole blog post with some more detailed thoughts on this. Curious if anything here resonates with other folks. Thanks to @iame.li, @dholms.at, and @bnewbold.net for helpful pointers and discussions! pckt.blog/b/bits-of-en...

All data should be permissioned data - Bits of Entropy

My post with vague complaints about the proposal that made for permissioned data got a bit of attention. Daniel was kind enough to take the time to chat with me...

pckt.blog

Richard Barnes@ipv.sx · last mo.

@dholms.at - What is the right venue for discussion on this Permissioned Data proposal you wrote up. atp@ietf.org or something else? I think it is wrong in some pretty fundamental ways. Or at least the motivations are poorly articulated.

Okay, NotebookLM generated slidedecks were magic a few months ago. Now you can spot one a mile away and my brain simply wont engage with it. Just send me some bullet points you wrote yourself instead please.

I’m in London this week for a BRIMES conference roundtable discussion with my Fighting Erasure project collaborators. Our work highlights the critical role that digital archiving and secure archival collections play in protecting cultures that are suffering violent, intentional erasure.

Bild

Elsevier's operating margin: 38%. Google's: ~25%. The most profitable information company on earth isn't a tech giant — it's a journal publisher that doesn't pay its authors or peer reviewers. The product is the community, extracted as rent. Scholarly publishing is a heist dressed up as public good.