@visionzeroannarbor.org

https://visionzeroannarbor.org/

On this day 7 years ago I asked neighborhood kids to write to their councilmembers in response to proposed crosswalk changes and one CM admitting she doesn’t always yield to pedestrians. Cards and drawings were emailed to all CMs so that they could be on the record, forever. #a2council

BildBildBild

It’s clear that the “curb carts stored in bike lane” See Click Fix category is just going to /dev/null. Absolutely no action other than an automated acknowledgment, even when a ticket is created weekly for the same address. Ann Arbor needs to step up enforcement. #A2Council

If walking costs you $1, we all pay $0.01. If biking costs you $1, we all pay $0.08. If bussing costs you $1, we all pay $1.50. If driving costs you $1, we all pay $9.20. Via study that still underestimates climate cost. This isn’t about choice. It’s about who pays for your choice. #citymakingmath

Detailed math as referenced in the post on “how much does your commute cost or save society?” Source is Discourse Media.

It’s nice out and the “nobody uses the bike lanes” lie is no longer remotely tenable. Folks are out enjoying summer Open Streets despite construction downtown. But on Nextdoor and Facebook, bikelash and autonormative chauvinism is still a constant theme. #A2Council #AnnArbor #A2VisionZero

Why do cops speed #A2Council? Aren’t they supposed to be *protecting* us from scofflaws, rather than being scofflaws themselves? Brought to you by an Ann Arbor Police Department SUV flying down Pauline at probably 45 mph.

Every time my town tries to put in sidewalks on a school route, the wealthy landowners who live nearby put up a huge fight. They say it’s about trees, or parking, or that somehow the sidewalk will be less safe (true story), but always the actual underlying principle is “fuck them kids.” #a2council

The War on Cars@thewaroncars.bsky.social · 3mo ago

New episode up! Streets can be more than places to move and store cars—they can be places for children to thrive. Alice Ferguson and Tim Gill call for a “radical, child-centric approach to transport policy and planning.” That would change everything for all of us. podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s...

A small girl wearing a bike helmet, maybe three years old, walks past a yellow sandwich board sign in the street with the slogan "ROAD CLOSED for essential repairs to childhood." Credit: "Essential Repair" by Amy Rose.

✨ introducing… ✨ 🌇 Transportation for the Abundant Society 🚅 "Abundance" says our problem is artificial scarcity—especially housing. But you can’t build your way out if transportation policy still treats traffic flow as sacred. Transportation is the binding constraint. ssrn.com/abstract=538...

Abstract for Transportation for the Abundant Society:

A growing chorus known as the abundance movement seeks to overcome artificial scarcity in the built environment—especially housing. Yet this movement’s signature goal of increasing housing production collides with a central driver of scarcity: development restrictions rooted in traffic concerns. Advocates often assume that building more housing will generate support for needed transportation reform. Experience suggests otherwise. In auto-dependent regions, adding housing without reconfiguring transportation tends to reinforce the logic of restriction. Unlocking abundance’s promised feedback loops requires re-grounding transportation policy in its relationship to land use.

This Article makes two contributions. First, it introduces into legal analysis a core urban-planning framework: transportation accessibility, which evaluates system performance by users’ ability to reach destinations. Though facially modest, anchoring policy in accessibility would depart sharply from a century of practice, with significant implications across state and local government law.

Second, drawing on 13 original interviews with current and former transportation officials, the Article develops a novel account of institutional barriers to reform. Far from the marble corridors and mahogany courtrooms where law is articulated, transportation policy is functionally made in the unglamorous offices of state and local government. We call this institutional crucible—shaped by agency culture and industry convention as well as hard law—“transportation policy linoleum.” It helps explain why proven, seemingly unobjectionable reforms routinely wither. The Article closes with a policy playbook designed to help accessibility break through the linoleum and deliver abundance.Table of Contents

CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION	3
I.  ABUNDANCE AND TRANSPORTATION POLICY	6
A. The Rise of Abundance	7
B. Transportation as a Binding Constraint	10
II. THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPORTATION POLICY	17
A. What Counts as Success?	18
B. From Mobility to Access	20
C. Transportation Policy Spillovers	24
1.	Housing affordability	24
2.	Climate mitigation	28
3.	Roadway safety	29
III. OPERATIONAL BARRIERS TO REFORM	32
A. Network Effects and System Interdependence	33
B. Operational Complexity and Risk	34
IV. LEGAL BARRIERS TO REFORM	36
A. NEPA and the Dawn of Conservation Primacy	36
B. Judges as Planners: California’s CEQA Regime	40
C. Judges as Planners Around the Country	44
1.	Minnesota and comprehensive planning	44
2.	Washington, D.C. and density review	46
3.	Montana and constitutional penumbra	46
V. TRANSPORTATION POLICY LINOLEUM	48
A. Policy “In Books” and “In Action”: 13 Interviews	48
B. Fragmentation and Coordination Failures	49
C. Path Dependence and Institutional Lock-In	53
D. Legal Risk and Defensive Administration	55
VI. A POLICY PLAYBOOK FOR ACCESS	57
A. Behavioral Data as Participation	57
1.	Ex ante participation	58
2.	Ex post participation	59
B. Realistic Alternatives Modeling	59
C. A More Honest Cost-Benefit Analysis	60
1.	Requiring cost-benefit discipline	61
2.	Accounting for opportunity costs and externalities	63
CONCLUSION	64

ToC continued, plus first bit of text from article:

A central claim of the emerging “abundance agenda” is that in the physical world, more is more: more housing, more clean energy, and more infrastructure to support both. Abundance brings the American promise of plenty into policy, arguing that government should expand capacity—so that individuals can access the good life and society can advance climate goals, scientific discovery, and prosperity. In both its academic and popular expressions, the ideologically diverse movement  contends that law has created artificial scarcity  and that the remedy is to loosen outdated constraints and rebuild state capacity  so government can build and approve major projects—housing, transportation, energy, health—more quickly and reliably.
Abundance draws on a substantial literature diagnosing law-made supply constraints in American public policy. Its core question is pragmatic: how to clear regulatory blockages to enable more building. Scholars have long identified such blockages at the intersection of land use and transportation, from highways to high-speed rail. Yet even improved megaprojects would not meet most Americans’ daily transportation needs. And the connection between transportation policy and abundance remains underdeveloped, even as political interest grows.

There are many in Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti that are skeptical of protected bike lanes. I think it just makes sense to have a small amount of space reserved for the most efficient form of transportation. As we look towards a sustainable future, it just makes sense. #a2Council #YpsiCouncil

Dave Robertson@davebikeski.bsky.social · 4mo ago

"Cycling represents one of the most energy-efficient forms of transport ever invented, allowing humans to travel faster and farther while using less energy than walking or running." #bicycles #cycling ☺️🚲

“Senate Bill 847 would require drivers to pass vision, written knowledge and driving skills tests at a Michigan Secretary of State branch office every four years beginning on their 75th birthday… [and] annual[ly]… beginning at age 85.” #A2Council #Michigan #VisionZero www.abc12.com/news/state/b...

Bill would increase testing rules for elderly Michigan drivers

Senate Bill 847 would require drivers to pass additional Secretary of State tests every four years beginning at age 75 and every year beginning at age 85.

abc12.com

There is now a website for the effort to save the AAATA Route 30 bus in Scio Township west of Ann Arbor along Jackson Rd. to the Meijer’s, IHA and Michigan Medicine West Arbor campuses, Alpha House, and many homes and businesses. #AnnArbor #A2Council #Scio www.savethe30.com

SAVE THE 30

Scio Township is considering a plan that would eliminate the number 30 bus route on Jackson Ave., west of Wagner. This means the AAATA number 30 bus stop at Meijer would be eliminated and there would...

savethe30.com