Washington AI Resistance

@wa-air.bsky.social

WA-AIR brings together community members, environmental advocates, technologists, and organizers to advocate for responsible governance of both artificial intelligence and the infrastructure that powers it.

This is absolutely true, AND we need laws that place the accountability for "rogue" AI (and other mishaps) DIRECTLY at the feet of the CEO's.

Lora Kolodny@lorak.bsky.social · 5h ago

Dr. @timnitgebru.blacksky.app, founder of DAIR, said plenty of laws already apply to AI and claims of existential risks are overblown. “There is no AI exemption in existing statutes. Fraud is still fraud. Discrimination is still discrimination.” www.cnbc.com/2026/09/15/t...

Dr. @timnitgebru.blacksky.app, founder of DAIR, said plenty of laws already apply to AI and claims of existential risks are overblown. “There is no AI exemption in existing statutes. Fraud is still fraud. Discrimination is still discrimination.” www.cnbc.com/2026/09/15/t...

Trump’s opposition to AI rules undercuts industry's calls for a slowdown

Anthropic and OpenAI have called for mandatory safety checks to be put in place as fears intensify that AI can soon be too powerful to control.

cnbc.com

New Environmental Protection Network report finds unprecedented electricity demand for AI #datacenters carries significant risks to our health. Former EPA officials & health experts document 30+ federal actions making a more polluting AI buildout more likely. safernotsicker.org/take-action/...

The Hidden Costs of AI Data Centers - Safer Not Sicker

The Hidden Health Costs of AI Data Centers AI data center pollution can make people sick. Instead of protecting Americans’ health, the EPA is making the health risks worse. A new report finds the unpr...

safernotsicker.org

I really want people to think more like organizers. I'm seeing endless debate, and more than a little conspiracy theorizing, about the motivations behind the big companies' warnings about the danger of AI. And almost no discussion about how we seize this moment to demand the policies we want.

I'm going to sleep now & someone wake me up when LessWrong isn't being cited in the mainstream. Wake me up when the eugenicist doomsday cult led by a self described "genius" writing fan fiction about having sex with girls to increase population "intelligence," isn't setting the "AI" narrative.



Nate Silver
@NateSilver538
The AI risk people actually do show their work! There are hundreds of working papers, thousands of LessWrong posts, literally entire best-selling books about this.
Quote

rat king 🐀
@MikeIsaac
·
Sep 11
a frustrating thing about all the "TK percent chance we die" headlines is that researchers can say any number and non-technical people will just be like "damn well that guy's in tech, im worried"

show your work! is this about scaling laws or some arxiv file ive yet to read?

it's unclear whether this is a rationalist-poisoned guy or just a deeply cynical valley guy but if you truly think this is what you and your peers are doing this is a very strange way to act. It also, as ever, doesn't deal with the actual harms happening today

People seem a little bit overly skeptical about the new technology, why might that be (Another former Anthropic engineer posts something floridly insane) Ah

Hey @ericlipton.nytimes.com 👋 AI is not “evolving” on its own. *People* are choosing how to build it. *People* are choosing how to train it. *People* are choosing how to run it. Maybe the problem is that they are the *wrong people* to make these choices.

Eric Lipton NYT@ericlipton.nytimes.com · last wk.

OpenAI’s top scientist, in a blog post on Sunday, warns that artificial intelligence is evolving so rapidly that it is becoming increasingly difficult for humans to understand and control it. Here is the post: openai.com/index/an-ali... And a couple of small excerpts--clear warnings.

I’m going to need everyone who’s reporting on AI psychosis and how it’s making people, especially men, come up with theories of everything to please talk with the scientists who have been getting multiple emails from “theory of everything” guys for decades

Serious people focus on the THEORETICAL harms, not the ACTUAL harms. I mean, who cares about a burning planet if a "rogue" statistics program does more or less what it was designed to do, with unanticipated consequences because some fools were in a damned rush to build the ultimate category killer?

The Economist@economist.com · last wk.

There is a respectable argument for slowing down AI research, but it rests on the danger to all humanity of the technology being abused or going rogue—not the local harms of data centres

Nice to see Cal Newport getting it right in the NYT. "This style of anxious talk also allows the A.I. companies to portray themselves as the reluctant 'stewards' of an inevitable technology, which is a framing they can use to deflect blame for damage caused by their own products."

Opinion | How Scared Should We Be of A.I. Right Now? (Gift Article)

The dark and distressing way that Silicon Valley talks about A.I. can be traced to a philosophy that influenced many tech executives.

nytimes.com

Concerned about data centers in Washington State, but not sure what to do about it? Join our MASS CALL on TUESDAY at 7pm, and get connected to local site fights, as well as the push for a statewide moratorium. The momentum is with us!

Mass Call on Data Centers in Washington

You might’ve heard a lot about AI data centers—they're popping up everywhere. If you're curious about why so many people are concerned about how they're using land, water, and electricity, or if you’v...

actionnetwork.org

At a certain point I have to ask myself if I got all this pedigree and spent decades doing research and building things to then spend the rest of my life attempting to come up with good arguments as to why the Cookie Monster isn't real.

“So you kind of just end up in the same situation, where not enough renewable energy is getting built, and coal plants have their lives extended." (And that's when there IS a substantial amount of new renewables being built for data centers, which is not true here in the US.)

Ketan Joshi@ketanjoshi.co · 4w ago

I have become pretty obsessed with why people - including many climate and renewable advocacy groups - keep insisting that "data centres will drive the energy transition" Here is a ~5,000 word essay I wrote on my blog that digs into why this keeps happening -->>> ketanjoshi.co/2026/08/14/p...

New York City is banning the use of generative artificial intelligence for public school students from 2K through 8th grade, part of a larger move to restrict classroom technology in the nation’s largest school district. https://cnn.it/4iGlH79

Bild