yarrow

@yarrow.gay

she/they glass artist MDNI ask for discord and signal

computer shit itself overnight it seems. Woke up to it seemingly powering on fine but no connection to the monitor and I don't have anything else with a DP or HDMI port to test with to see if it's a monitor, cable, or computer issue :/

If SCREEN were to pass, you'd be required to scan your face and upload an ID to access this site because it allows "harmful" material. This affects you even if you don't care about sex work or porn.

404 Media@404media.co · yesterday

Mike Lee's SCREEN Act, which heads to Senate Commerce Committee for markup on Wednesday, would expand age verification requirements to a nearly limitless scope of websites, and is supported by the architects of Project 2025.

I keep hearing how this site is "a left wing bubble" and then I keep hearing about trans people being banned. I've been reporting someone for stalking and harassment for several days, and yet you banned the woman he is stalking. We see you.

Another thing that pisses me off about the endless “BlueSky needs to be more welcoming to far-right Nazis” takes is, they are free to join. It seems BlueSky won’t take their posts down unless they contain a pic of an ass. What they want is an algorithm to force their rage-bait shit onto your feed.

Ciara | Ciaraíoch 🎨@ciaraioch.bsky.social · yesterday

"Bluesky is a political echo chamber" okay but I'm mostly here to chat with fun internet people and post art and make jokes, I cannot stress how much I don't care

One day left to leave a comment. Even if you disapprove of firearm ownership this rule is likely being used to set a legal battle that may strip blue states of the ability to change gender markers on IDs and other documents.

IllCaesar@illcaesar.bsky.social · last wk.

I know there's going to be a mixed response to this but there's only one week - until August 4th - left to leave a comment about the ATF's change to background check forms that would de facto single out and ban trans people from legally buying firearms.

Is The Trump Administration Attempting A Backdoor Gun Ban For Trans Americans?

Reporting indicates that the Trump admin is considering requiring gun applicants list their "biological sex at birth," which could put them in a bureaucratic catch-22 if it does not match their ID.

here's a fun lil exercise for cis people: how many articles would a publication have to print calling for your extermination before you would expect people who care about you to stop giving them money? and how would you feel if their excuse for still supporting them is some fuckass crossword puzzle?

And what about the 97%?? Your way would force THEM to go through THOSE SAME PERMANENT CHANGES But you believe the 3% are cis, so you don't care about the 97% that you'd be directly harming. When given the choice, you value the lives of 3 *possibly* cis children over those of 97 trans children

Post nicht verfügbar.

What you're saying here is that the lives and happiness of that 3% are more important than those of the 97%. In a room of 100 people, you would fuck over 97 of them for the benefit of 3, because you care more about the lives of 3 cis people than 97 trans people. Examine that.

Post nicht verfügbar.

just said this on another post but it bears repeating: the thing about continuing to give money to any jk rowling properties or the nyt is not that they’re shitty about trans people, which they are. it is that both of these entities MATERIALLY CONTRIBUTE to the legal challenges to trans rights