Ari B Friedman

@abfriedman.com

This is my personal account. Faculty at UPenn. Emergency doc, health economist, geriatrics and privacy researcher. Views are my own. RT does not imply endorsement.

How could the expiration of enhanced ACA Marketplace subsidies affect families? LDI's Betsy Salazar & colleagues conducted a simulation, and found that premiums could rise to 15% of total income for some middle-income families. Salazar discusses this finding in a new Q&A: https://bit.ly/4bHPd8z

Why Some Family Health Insurance Is Now Pricier

LDI/CHOP experts estimated the potential effect of the expiration of enhanced ACA Marketplace subsidies on family premiums across income levels.

bit.ly

Parallels to medical malpractice are strong here: pick one conceptualization. If LLM is an algorithm, then the corporation is responsible. If the algorithm is an “intelligence,” “a colleague,” a licensed “practitioner,” or has a corporate title, then an employee of these corporations hacked rivals.

Kris Shrishak@krisshrishak.bsky.social · 6d ago

There is always a human responsible Principle '"The algorithm did it" is not an acceptable excuse if algorithmic systems make mistakes or have undesired consequences, including from machine-learning processes' Claims www.bbc.com/news/article... www.bbc.com/news/article... #AI @abeba.blacksky.app

Yep, elements of all of those are visible in the data. US median wealth dipping much more deeply during the GFC was in part because the median American has much higher exposure to equities than the median European.

My quote of the day I consider myself a perpetual student. You seek and learn every day: from an experiment in the lab, from reading a scientific journal, from taking care of a patient. Because of this, I rarely get bored. Anthony Fauci

NEW: A large trove of Claude-generated documents have been exposed to the web and indexed by Google. We reviewed what appear to be real medical records, the full names and phone numbers of school-aged children, and company documents marked for internal use only. futurism.com/artificial-i...

A Whole Bunch of People's Claude Chats Are Publicly Accessible Online, and There's Some Wildly Private Stuff in There

A trove of documents generated by Anthropic's Claude were indexed by Google. They included medical records and student information.

futurism.com

Wow! These articles convinced me, and I will use this knowledge to debunk anyone who claims otherwise. If the patient is experiencing it as an emergency it is one. I have noted incredibly long wait times in the ER for psychiatric patients in particular.

3. In repressive regimes, the task of dissent is to puncture the sense of inevitability. Modi’s been in power 12 years and very rarely so much as recognized an oppositional campaign. Now that he’s caved (bye, education minister), the entire possibilities landscape has changed and Modi knows it.

2. The internet still has power as a tool - not necessarily as an “equalizer” but to document injustice and call people to action. The police crackdowns, the involuntary hospitalization of a hunger striker, the vibey protests themselves were all documented and posted and strengthened numbers.

1. Revelry and satire are a CRITICAL component of building power. We think political movements must be serious, weighty, earnest. But in Delhi, as elsewhere, protests have become vibey social hotspots. Lots of food (mobile Sikh and Muslim kitchens!), festival-like energy. Brutal memes on signs.

🧵🧵There are a bunch of lessons from India’s Cockroach Janata protest movement, which in a matter of weeks brought an increasingly authoritarian prime minister to heel and achieved real gains from a govt that’s been largely immune to forces of accountability. Here are a few off the top of my head🧵

“Cockroach” protesters

When the AHRQ cancellations started, no one was giving the public a clear picture of what was being lost. My team built one. This is research that makes care safer and more affordable. Americans deserve to know what's happening to it. Researchinterrupted.academyhealth.org

Research Interrupted: Canceled AHRQ Grants | AcademyHealth

When health care research stops, the answers stop with it. Explore AcademyHealth's interactive tracker on canceled AHRQ research grants and lost funding.

researchinterrupted.academyhealth.org

Not surprisingly, this document is all about funding industry. There is no discussion at all about ensuring transparency and accountability in these relationships, or managing conflicts-of-interest (even as it mentions the "gold standard" EO). The lesson seems to be industry good, academia bad.

Strengthen Public-Private Partnerships and Talent Flows: The university
is no longer the only home of America’s most innovative scientific research. Expand agency-adjacent foundations, focus Small Business
Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer
(STTR) programs to build strategic capabilities, and support joint centers
among industry, academia, and federal facilities. Scale industry Ph.D. and
postdoc fellowships that move talent fluidly between sectors, drawing on
America’s private sector strengths to bring industry-scale resources to our academic researchers.

Seems he grabbed the wrong end of this particular stick. The fact that industry funding is huge does not mean that federal funding should add to it. Shouldn't it be evidence that the govt should fund what industry *won't*, to expand the possibility of discovery and innovation? Or fund across fields?

Government funding of research and development, especially basic science in the academy and national labs, has rightly grown in the eight decades since Bush’s report. But private industry has become by far the largest source of research and development (R&D) funding in the United States, with its share nearly doubling from the 1950s to today. American companies now deploy around $700 billion annually, more than triple the combined spending from government and higher education. This evolution has made the pie bigger for everybody and should be welcomed across the research ecosystem, but it demands a corresponding adjustment to the nature of the Federal Government’s contributions.

Despite what he says, this is a remarkably narrow scope. Obviously, no social scientists. But what about basic researchers? Evolutionary biologists? Theoretical physicists? Psychologists? Science philanthropies? Pharmaceutical companies? (Wow, I never thought I would be lobbying for pharma).

In preparing this report, I have consulted widely across the country’s scientific enterprise, from entrepreneurs driving world-changing breakthroughs in fusion technology, to researchers eager to pursue bold ideas in neuroscience at our universities, to venture capitalists funding revolutionary platforms for drug discovery. Their message is clear and inspiring: given the right conditions, American ingenuity will continue to achieve the impossible.

Yes, they focus on AI, but there is no respect for basic research, which has historically driven innovation in the US. Basic research is inefficient, creative, serendipitous. Industry won't fund it. Here, they are imagining innovation as purely market-oriented, not necessarily novel.