Andy Berner

@andybrnr.bsky.social

Meteorology PhD, data scientist, ski mountaineer, GSP and Eurohound dad

I fundamentally do not know how to square the politics whereby Democrats will essentially have to tell the American people that because they (the voters) made an extremely stupid decision, they need to lower their expectations substantially for the foreseeable future, but here we are.

On the other hand, if your worry is sectoral in nature (say, the effect of imports on your auto industry) you should respond by industrial policies encouraging productive investments. Again, tariffs are a blunt tool. +

Yes. This point is not sufficiently recognized in the global imbalances debate. If you think your CA deficit is excessive and caused by factors outside your borders, you should tax or otherwise discourage capital inflows. Tariffs are a very blunt tool at best. +

Michael Pettis@michaelpettis.bsky.social · 2w ago

8/9 I agree, and this suggests that rather than encourage capital inflows, economies that want to strengthen their manufacturing and productive sectors and to benefit workers by raising productivity and wages should consider capital controls as a far more effective tool than tariffs.

Apologies if I sound angry, but it is a real problem that the 'smart' commentary on this war is trying hard to avoid the core lesson ("the president is a fucking moron") because it doesn't sound very clever when it is absolutely the most important takeaway from this debacle.

The second strategic failure is that the American people (re)elected a worthless fucking moron like Donald Trump, who is boundlessly confident despite knowing nothing about anything and so asked the US military to do the impossible for no reason at all because he got lucky in Venezuela.

Fable concludes that an untrained adult would throw a naan further as there's sufficient membrane tension to stop folding. A baguette javelin would theoretically go further but is too unstable to maintain flight and would start tumbling unless you could add spin-stabilization or fins.

Bild

Clausewitz. Yeah. Of course. You can see it right in On War. If you're the superpower, you just win! Stab yourself repeatedly in the face in a confused war with no clear political end-state? It doesn't matter! Nothing matters!

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 2w ago

Rep. Rich McCormick on Iran: "I'm a big Clausewitzian warfare guy. I believe in dominance. We are the dominant world superpower. These guys are not. I would've been unrelenting until the end."

I’m increasingly of the opinion that when AI Overviews disappears we’re going to realize it was the funniest thing ever to happen on the internet Here for instance, it invents a totally new form of literary criticism, without being asked to! (rest of this is all about batteries)


Google
Sign in
Q good night, westley
All -
Images
Videos
Shopping
Short videos
• Al Overview
0-+2 :
Good work. Sleep well. I'll most likely kill you in the morning
• IMDb
Have you ever wondered what makes that line from The Princess Bride so perfect? It is a great contrast. The first part sounds like a kind boss.
The second part is a scary threat.
• Instagram • Ekazop
It is just like a battery. A battery has two ends: a positive end and a negative end. Let's look at how that works.
Parts of a Battery
• Cathode: This is the positive end. It pulls things in. Think of it like a magnet grabbing tiny metal bits.
• Anode: This is the negative end. It pushes things out. Think of it like a crowded room pushing people out the door.

IMHO a lot of this is now a soft version of what has happened with Russia and Putin. The problem with "touch the stove" is that basic recognition of the sheer scale of Trump's screwups means a shattering of the assumptions needed to keep business as usual going. There's nowhere left to hide if

Nicholas Grossman@nicholasgrossman.bsky.social · 4w ago

The US govt, markets, and a lot of media told you there's peace with Iran and shipping is flowing. What's actually happened is the war entered a new phase: the fight for Hormuz. Trump lost his war so badly the US aim now is just to get back to the pre-war status quo. I explain in @ms.now, ICYMI:

Props to @ametsoc.org for joining the chorus. "If implemented, [the OMB rule] would damage the nation’s ability to understand, predict, and respond to severe weather, drought, and other natural hazards with negative impacts on public safety and the economy."

AMS Summary Comments on the Office of Management and Budget Proposed Rule on Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance

The AMS is a global community committed to advancing weather, water, and climate science and service.

ametsoc.org