Ariel R. White

@arielrwhite.bsky.social

https://arwhite.mit.edu/

The government moving or hiding jailed people to avoid review by courts isn't some loophole in our habeas corpus rights. This government behavior has been considered a violation of the people's habeas corpus rights since at least the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_...

Jailors were forbidden to move prisoners from one prison to another or out of the country to evade the writ. In case of disobedience jailers would be punished with severe fines which had to be paid to the prisoner.[5][6]
Gillian Brockell@gillianbrockell.com · 7d ago

This will make it nearly impossible to file habeas petitions, because attorneys won’t even know what federal district their client has been moved to to stage for their removal. Something like a third of all people in ICE custody. apnews.com/article/ice-...

If you're at APSA2026, RSF organized a panel on "Seeking Research Funding in the Social Sciences": come join us at 2pm in Sheraton Back Bay Ballroom D to talk about how to apply for grants in this...very odd time for funding.

Taken together, these rules are expected to add significant red tape for foreign students, researchers, and international journalists — and significant costs as well. DHS's own estimate is that the rule will impose costs to U.S. and non-U.S. parties of up to $443 million a year.

DHS has prepared a full analysis according to E.O. 12866 and E.O. 13563, which can be found in the docket for this rulemaking or by searching for RIN 1653-AA95 on www.regulations.gov. Table 1 presents the accounting statement as required by Circular A-4 for total impacts of the rule. The proposed rule would have a quantified annualized cost ranging from $443.1 million to $448.6 million (with 3- and 7-percent discount rates, respectively) when considering U.S. and non-U.S. parties. When considering U.S. parties only, annual costs would range from $119.9 million to $125.1 million (with 3- and 7- percent discount rates, respectively).
N

First, submit your own comment. The comment should be in your own words, not copy-pasted from another comment, since duplicate comments are considered as one. You can submit it directly to the OMB site, or through the AAUP/Stand up for Science site so that they can track the comments submitted.

Arguably, no law in American history was a product of more public deliberation and more attention from the political branches than the Voting Rights Act. We fought a Civil War to put authorization of it in the Constitution. It then took 100 years of protest/lobbying to get the legislation passed.

D

The decision in Louisiana v. Callais claims, "By 2004, the racial gap in voter registration and turnout had largely disappeared.... Black voters now participate in elections at similar rates as the rest of the electorate" (26–27). This is misleading: White turnout remains much higher than non-White.

His wife: "We believed that the United States welcomed international students, professors, and academics from around the world....We believed that freedom of speech was real. We believed that the U.S. was moving closer to its democratic ideals. But now...none of this seems to be working anymore."

Wife of Virginia Tech PhD student detained by ICE says 'status story is just an excuse'

Aliyeh Hashemi says her husband Yousof Azizi was never a member of any terrorist-linked organization and was in the country legally when ICE agents arrested him.

wusa9.com

Who should apply? We have 3 formats: 1) Posters (perfect for advanced graduate students) 2) Papers (perfect for ppl w/ a well-developed project 3) Research designs (perfect for ppl w/ good ideas who need feedback) 3/4

I'm asking the PhD students in a seminar class to give each other feedback on their research paper designs. Anyone have readings they like on "how to be a good political science discussant/reviewer"?

I'm asking the PhD students in a seminar class to give each other feedback on their research paper designs. Anyone have readings they like on "how to be a good political science discussant/reviewer"?