I don’t know what part of the article is this framework beyond specifying that the person in question identifies as a gender expansive lesbian and uses he/him pronouns, and then consistently using those pronouns to refer to him. Is it explaining a thing that a lot of people are unfamiliar with?
and its like the framework is "look at this CRAZY DISABLED LESBIAN!CHECK OUT HIS WEIRD PRONOUNS!" and the misogyny and queerphobia go unremarked on and it's like "i think that is at least a part of the story that maybe someone could've picked up on, anyone, please???"