Bruce Bradbury

@brucebradbury.bsky.social

An Australian economist writing on social and economic policy and outcomes. https://www.unsw.edu.au/staff/bruce-bradbury

The title is a little pointed, but I am very serious here. Academics, medical researchers, and other organisations should not collect data on birth sex. It is rarely relevant, and it almost always leads to privacy violations for transgender people. Please share. I would like people to read this one.

Separating sex and gender is statistical malpractice – Notes from a data witch

Statisticians and academics in Australia should ignore the terrible advice of most LGBTIQA+ organisations and read this post instead. The 2020 ABS standard is almost never the correct way to collect d...

blog.djnavarro.net

Google is turning the screws. The only way I can now see my past searches in maps (on Pixel 8 pro) is if I turn on "Personalised Recommendations in Search Services". That is, saving all my activity across different Google sites and services, and allowing Google to use this to target ads to me.

Google maps 'get directions' screenshot. Shows that History (past searches) is not saving.

This paper finds that economists whose job market papers report (marginally) statistically significant results are more likely to secure academic jobs. Hiring committees prefer statistical significance; this creates incentives for researchers to p-hack.

Bild

"Some economists and tax experts have urged a broader abolition of stamp duty, describing it as inefficient and a brake on mobility." I would say, just about every economist who has looked at this. Replacing with a land tax ticks all the boxes (except how to change). www.afr.com/property/res...

ACT abolishes stamp duty for first home buyers

It’s the latest move by the territory government in its 20-year tax reform transition program to phase out stamp duty in favour of higher rates and land taxes.

afr.com

Me reading the abstract: Well, 'coding error' is a bit strong, isn't it, they just disagreed on some variable coding. Me getting to p. 3: Oh, OOOHHH, OH NO!!!!

B&B grouped the 71 teams into 13 disciplinary categories without providing a theoretical justification for such fine-grained coding. This choice has significant consequences: four of these categories contain only a single team. Consequently, the dummies for these categories identify individual teams, functioning equivalently to team fixed effects. Since ideology is measured at the team level and does not vary within teams, these four teams—and their 80 reported AMEs—are effectively excluded and do not contribute to the estimation of the ideology effect.
Michael Clemens@mclem.org · 4mo ago

Remember that recent paper claiming to show that "ideological bias" determined the results obtained by immigration policy research teams? A careful, open-code reanalysis by @kauspurg.bsky.social & Josef Brüderl finds that the result arises from a coding error. —> doi.org/10.31222/osf...