Dana Berube

@dana-berube.bsky.social

Boston-based SFF writer, artist, Mongolia enthusiast! [she/her] Repped by @benglishhh.bsky.social

Not my 36-year-old brother texting me to say "remember when you told me as a kid that if I swallowed the littlest bit of toothpaste, I would die, and I worried about it for years??" Man, younger siblings never let anything go.

I had a feeling these two would make for an excellent double-feature about humanity’s relationship with animals and nomadism/pastoralism, particularly in a modern (and specifically post-Communist) world, and I was 100% right. Great, mind-expanding reads for this city gal @songsforhorses.com

A Song for the Horses by KG Hutchins and ANIMA by Kaplan Kassabova, the first an academic ethnomusicology book about music, heritage, and animal husbandry in Mongolia, the second a creative nonfiction book about the author living with the last remaining shepherds in rural Bulgaria

I have hit 100,000 words in this novel, but what I am most proud of is how close to the end I got before hitting that mark, because my stuff is always much too long! I'd love to keep it under 120k by the end.

As anyone in publishing will tell you, women do not resist reading books by men, but men will often dismiss books by women. This is not a publishing problem or a failure to target men. It's a misogyny problem.

But if you go down the LLM road, you are bound to that path. If the tech bros who own that LLM begin charging thousands of $ a month to use their program, you're facing a major gatekeeper. And yes, once our current AI bubble breaks the subsidized cost of using LLMs is going to skyrocket. 4/

Right now anyone can learn to write or create art. The price of admission is incredibly, super-duper low. Don't have a computer? You can write or draw on paper. Yes, it takes time to learn how to tell good stories or create compelling art, but there is no gatekeeper. 3/

They have been jackhammering outside my apartment for 3 straight days with such fervor that at this point I can only assume they are digging to China, and I look forward to spelunking down to Beijing for some jianbing and chuanr

Because it apparently needs to be said: I have never fucking used the AI/LLM/chatbot/plagiarism machine and I never fucking will. If you use it, I think you're a bad person.

Lockdown in Hellworld was a very validating read for me. Proof that, yeah, that shit really happened, we all went through that. You wouldn't think you'd need the reminder of what it felt like at the time, but it does help. That shit sucked. Good book though.

Luke O'Neil@lukeoneil47.bsky.social · 2w ago

I don't plug this book as much because people didn't seem to want to read about Covid while it was still peak Covid but maybe some of you all do need a reminder of what it was actually like as it happened. www.orbooks.com/catalog/lock...

There will be a million books written about this period
in history but most of them will come when it’s all said and
done. Writing about it now at the beginning of the pandemic—and to be clear we are still in the beginning of this
in America despite being six months along—feels strange it
feels like you’ve just jumped off a cliff into the ocean and as
you’re falling someone shouts out How’s the water? and you
yell back What? and then you keep falling.
I thought for some reason anyway I’d get a lot of this
down as it was happening. Not for history because I hate that
framing the idea that you hear so often now like “History
won’t look favorably on this” usually when it’s someone panicking about Trump’s latest fuck up. It’s just such a strange
way of thinking about the world to me. It’s a form of punting responsibility for real problems happening right now to
some later date at which point the future moon historians or
whatever will arrive and right the wrongs of our present with
their scathing appraisal of how terrible Trump was.
Not only is it a type of cowardice—“outsourcing this to
the future when people will care” as a buddy of mine said—it
doesn’t even happen to be true. The history books do not in fact
tell us the real unvarnished dirt on what our leaders and so on
were up to that’s like the one main thing we know about history
books that they’re fucked up and biased and written from the
perspective of the victors. On top of that thinking about this
particular pandemic in terms of what will be said about it later
is just real fucking weird because did we even learn about the
Spanish flu in the books we were meant to have read? I certainly
don’t remember reading about it in school.