Veronique Kiermer

@verokiermer.bsky.social

Chief Scientific Officer @plos.org. Views are my own.

A great opportunity for researchers to contribute to a great organization, and to how they want their work surfaced in all contexts where it matters! If you are thinking about applying, apply!!

ORCID@orcid.org · 2mo ago

⭐️ Nominations now open for ORCID Board: 👉 https://info.orcid.org/nominations-now-open-for-orcid-board-elections-2027/ & ⭐️ ORCID's Researcher Advisory Council: 👉 https://info.orcid.org/calling-all-researchers-orcid-researcher-advisory-council-nominations-now-open/ 📅 Nominations due 26 June!

Quote by Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
ORCID Board Chair, 2024-2026
ORCID Board Director 2021-2026

"We examined authorship guidelines issued by journals ... & found [them] highly variable. We propose ... a shared, principle-based framework grounded in transparency, credit, and accountability." @verokiermer.bsky.social et al on authorship culture www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

PNAS

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...

pnas.org

Authorship decisions should be anchored in the inseparable principles of credit, accountability and transparency. Credit entails accountability and accountability entails credit. Transparency is required because authorship practices must evolve with research practices. doi.org/10.1073/pnas...

PNAS

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...

doi.org

10 years since CRediT was introduced, >20% adoption (of full text in Dimensions). Now, we need to build on this to comprehensively integrate CRediT in metadata and make sure the taxonomy evolves to remain fit for purpose. doi.org/10.1038/d415... W/ @sjcporter.bsky.social Liz Allen Ruth Whitman

A ten-year drive to credit authors for their work — and why there’s still more to do

Information about the roles of each author of a paper can help to build trust, integrity and responsible research assessment. Coordinated efforts are needed to consolidate progress.

doi.org

My new PLOS Bio piece about when one's work is misrepresented: "[T]here is a normative expectation within scholarly research that all parties are well-intentioned and truth-seeking...when invitations to engage genuinely are not accepted..scholarly discourse is ill-equipped to resolve the conflict."

Science becomes trustworthy by constantly questioning itself

What happens when the greatest strengths of science, such as openness, humility, self-criticism and self-correction, are exploited for political gain? This Perspective calls for scientists to affirm t...

journals.plos.org

🚨Still time to register. "Unconferences" are fun. And this one is about Responsible Research in Action, even better! A great opportunity to dig deep into important issues with people from different horizons.

PLOS@plos.org · 12mo ago

Join the #ResponsibleResearchInAction Unconference in Berlin, Sep 22–24. The event brings together not just researchers, funders, publishers, patients and more, shaping the future of research together. Learn more and register your place: plos.io/3JwdxP6 #ResponsibleResearch #RRiA2025 #OpenScience

PLOS ONE metadata forms the basis of our study's Figure 1. We could only study PLOS ONE because PLOS made this metadata freely available (and in bulk XML, no less)! Information is only useful if it is accessible! plos.org/text-and-dat...

Text & Data Mining - PLOS

The right to read is the right to mine. Openness inspires innovation, and PLOS is committed to making scientific work easily shared…

plos.org

PLOS@plos.org · 12mo ago

PLOS responds to a new PNAS study (plos.io/4lv6m7t) that uses openly available articles to map the scale of paper mill and peer review ring activity across scholarly publishing.

tl;dr — this EO co-opts the language of open science to implement a system of political control wherein presidential appointees are given broad latitude to designate any number of reasonable scientific activities and inferences as scientific misconduct, and to penalize those involved accordingly.

Restoring Gold Standard Science

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7301 of title 5, United

whitehouse.gov

🚨Submission deadline is approaching for the #EinsteinFoundationAward for Promoting Quality in Research. A prestigious and unique award recognizing efforts to improve research rigor, reliability and transparency. Three categories: three opportunities to nominate research heroes!

Einstein Foundation Berlin@einsteinberlin.bsky.social · last yr.

#Reminder: The €350K #EinsteinFoundationAward aims to provide recognition & publicity for outstanding efforts that enhance the rigor, reliability, robustness and transparency of research in three categories. The #CallForEntries closes 30/04/2025: award.einsteinfoundation.de

Very insightful piece by @ludowaltman.bsky.social on why publishing reform requires assessment reform AND vice versa. Coordination is crucial.

Leiden Madtrics@leidenmadtrics.bsky.social · last yr.

🤝 The need to reform research assessment and scientific publishing practices is widely recognized. However, @ludowaltman.bsky.social argues that the assessment and publishing reform movements will be successful only if they manage to align their agendas. 👇 Read about it in our latest blog post

Seismic scoop from @lenasun.bsky.social: A long-time anti-vaxer who was disciplined for practising medicine without a license has been selected by #HHS to conduct the study RFK Jr. wants looking yet again at whether vaccines cause autism. www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/...

Vaccine skeptic hired to head federal study of immunizations and autism

A long-discredited researcher and vaccine skeptic will conduct a government study on whether vaccines cause autism.

washingtonpost.com

We've started a consultation with academic leaders to understand how publishing a more complete record of research can support better recognition and rewards for researchers. Great to see a lot of alignment in our first workshop. theplosblog.plos.org/2025/03/why-...

Why we need to go ‘beyond the article’ to transform research - The Official PLOS Blog

Over the course of 18 months, we are working on an ambitious new project to Redefine Publishing. Working with stakeholders from across…

theplosblog.plos.org

Once again a splendid line up of winners for this important award. The focus of the Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research is unique yet so important. If you can, join the live stream to honor the winners!

PLOS@plos.org · last yr.

The 2024 Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research will be presented next Thursday, March 13! Join the @einsteinberlin.bsky.social livestream to be part of the ceremony and celebrate the winners: plos.io/3QOovQr

A series of white, stacked blocks engraved with text related to the Einstein Foundation Award, emphasizing the promotion of quality in research.

We (AIMOS and RORI) launched a metascience platform, MetaROR.org, several months ago 😀. Submit your metascience-related preprints and get peer reviews! André Brasil articulates the vision here, reflecting the hard work he's done to get the platform working for us. katinamagazine.org/content/arti...

Rethinking How Research is Reviewed, Curated, and Communicated

MetaROR uses the publish-review-curate model to share work in the field of metaresearch. In this Q and A, Moumita Koley and André Brasil discuss the platform in the context of a scholarly publishing s...

katinamagazine.org

Thank you for all the input so far on the Metascience Alliance! A wide range of perspectives is crucial for informing future development. 🗣️ Please continue to share this call. The feedback form is open through 3/16/25. (See further info in the thread below.) docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...

Metascience Alliance - Initial Concept Feedback

Thank you for your interest in the Metascience Alliance! If you wish to receive updates on the Metascience Alliance, please join the mailing list! Privacy Notice The Center for Open Science is reque...

docs.google.com

Center for Open Science@cos.io · last yr.

The Metascience Alliance is launching at #Metascience2025! This new cross-sector network is building collaboration to better understand & improve the research system. We want your input! Here's how to get involved (🧵)