Stefan Pfattheicher

@stepf.bsky.social

Here to share The Transparent and Open Science Game: https://osf.io/t9ngd/ boredom | empathy | pro- and antisocial behavior and traits | pasta | Aarhus University

The sheer figure of 20% blows my mind. Experts are probably well aware of that. That seems to be a little higher than the chances for russian soldiers to die within one year on the front. And we talk about scaring them away by depriving them of money or putting them in camps. And people think it's

Klaus Pforr@klauspforr.eurosky.social · 5d ago

This working paper looks at the effect of success beliefs among rural Gambians about successfully reaching Europe if they tried to. People *overestimate* the probability of dying en route with 50% instead of the estimated 20%. www.rfberlin.com/network-pape...

Out in PNAS pnas.org/doi/10.1073/... Inequality is not only hard to solve. Sometimes, it is hard to *see*. We ask a simple question: Do people notice when members of minority groups are absent? Across field studies and experiments, the answer was often no.

PNAS

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...

pnas.org

🚨NEW PREPRINT🚨 together with Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler: “Massaging Significance in the Age of Open Science: A Satirical Tutorial,” which is a public service for anyone unwilling to let inconvenient data get in the way of a compelling narrative. 😉 Link to preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps...

Bild

3 new studies on using psychedelics as treatments for mental disorders just came out; 2 in JAMA Psychiatry, 1 in Lancet Psychiatry. I reviewed one of these submissions. Here are the core results. 🧵

Denmark is often portrayed as a fairly equal society, but when looking at the distribution of wealth a different picture emerges. The richest 1% of the population owns more wealth than the bottom 82% combined. Wealth tax is now being debated. #dkmedier #dkpol #dkvalg (oxfam.dk/publikatione...)

Ny analyse: Top 1 pct. har mere formue end 82 pct. af den danske befolkning

En ny opgørelse viser, at de rigeste cirka 48.000 mennesker i Danmark har lige så meget formue som 3,9 millioner danskere tilsammen.

oxfam.dk

🧵on my new paper "Synthetic personas distort the structure of human belief systems" w Roberto Cerina I'm v excited about... 🚨 Do synthetic samples look like human samples? We compare 28 LLMs to the 2024 General Social Survey (GSS) to find out + develop host of diagnostics...

This recent RCT of an "AI stethoscope" claims the technology "shows promise" for diagnosing cardiovascular conditions. It does not. It is a textbook example of the risks of conducting unprincipled 'per protocol analyses'. Once again, peer review at a major medical journal has failed. 🧵 1/

The Lancet@thelancet.com · 7mo ago

AI-enabled stethoscopes show promise for improving diagnosis of cardiovascular conditions, UK trial finds. Explore the research: spkl.io/63326AsjJ8

Graph showing use of AI stethoscope examinations (cardiac waveform recordings for AI interpretation) among recruited GP practices in the intervention group (n=96) during the first 12 months of implementation. Stacked bars represent the number of practices (y-axis, left) stratified by usage intensity category: high users (≥31 uses per month), medium users (10–30 uses per month), low users (<10 uses per month), and non-users (0 uses per month). Darker shades within each bar denote higher usage categories, with high users shown in the darkest shade. The overlaid line graph indicates cumulative number of AI stethoscope examinations (y-axis, right) over 12 months, with numbers above each bar denoting the total number of onboarded practices at that timepoint. AI=artificial intelligence. GP=general practitioner.

198 effect sizes in ego depletion resesrch showed an effect size of d=0.62. Preregistered large replications (including some by original authors) yielded an effect size of 0. No one has been able to offer any other explanation for this huge research waste than massive p-hacking.

Bild

Just an aside: 41 of the 100 meta analyses published in Psych Bull between 2023 and 2025 do not include *any* quality screening of identified studies. To the degree that those literatures include bad studies, they are being laundered together with the good ones.

Malte Elson@malte.the100.ci · 8mo ago

But even in Psychological Bulletin, quality assessments were done in 59/100 meta-analyses, and of those 50 had made their data available (47 included study identifiers). As such, /where/ quality ratings are shared, these typically include identifiers.

Researchers recently asked Americans what income level other people need in order to live a good life. A whopping 86% of Americans reported income levels well below what others say they themselves need. Fascinating!

BildBild

New paper out in @science.org! We unveil the online manipulation market with the Cambridge Online Trust & Safety Index (COTSI). We show in real time the cost of purchasing fake accounts across every social platform around the world - so they can be held accountable www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

Mapping the online manipulation economy

A market perspective on digital manipulation may help improve online trust and safety

science.org

🚨STOP, replication time!🚨 Does Feeling “Right” Make the Good More Good (and the Bad More Bad)? Achar & Lee found that when people experience regulatory fit, moral predispositions get amplified—moral folks act more moral, less moral folks act less moral. Big, exciting claim!