This captures why I absolutely can't stand the current UK Supreme Court's shift into absurdly rigid textualism and a version of the mirror principle that leads to viciously narrow readings of the ECHR. For a while, there was at least some awareness that judgments don't exist in a conceptual bubble
One of the bigger problems the 2025 ruling has introduced is establishing that, instead of resolving equality cases based on trying to as best as possible integrate everyone's right to be treated humanely, we use philosophical debates about what someone's true legal essence is to decide rights.