Debbie Gale Mitchell

@heydebigale.bsky.social

Chemist, 🧲 spectroscopist, mother, (Teaching) Professor of Chemistry at University of Denver. Loves reading romance and nonfiction 💖📚, currently writing a narrative nonfiction book on spectroscopy🚨Opinions and thoughts and posts are my own!

Thank you, @heydebigale.bsky.social , for both showing your vulnerability/humanity and taking an active (well earned) leadership role on this (demonstrating for all of us your integrity in your book writing process). We appreciate you!

Debbie Gale Mitchell@heydebigale.bsky.social · 9h ago

Okay genuinely asking— what does accountability look like for Holden Thorp and Hank Green? What I’d like to see: I’d love if @holdenthorp.bsky.social set a clear journalistic standard at SCIENCE and prohibited the use of LLMs for researching, writing, and editing publications at SCIENCE.

This is tremendous thread on what I think is THE key issue of our time- accountability. humility. being human. writing, teaching, learning, living and most of all, science! these are all *human* endeavors. the mess is the point, not the noise.we must embrace it and keep passing it on, celebrating it

Debbie Gale Mitchell@heydebigale.bsky.social · 9h ago

What I’m trying to say—writing should be a human endeavor. There is no place for LLMs in ANY step of the process because these are tools that are built on theft of creative work. As scientists we should be rejecting the use of LLMs! We should be holding a higher standard because it’s right.

Okay genuinely asking— what does accountability look like for Holden Thorp and Hank Green? What I’d like to see: I’d love if @holdenthorp.bsky.social set a clear journalistic standard at SCIENCE and prohibited the use of LLMs for researching, writing, and editing publications at SCIENCE.

Debbie Gale Mitchell@heydebigale.bsky.social · 4d ago

So in the last two weeks EIC of Science and a famous science communicator have lost massive amounts of credibility because of their reliance on LLMs... Some examples of how to lose trust with your audience to share with my students I guess.

Not sure if it’s deliberate or not on the part of ACS, but these are some of the shapes that stand out for me when I look at the logo. From top to bottom, diffraction, atom and electron density plot (or standing wave). I tend to think in shapes, so maybe it’s just me….

Bild

Actually, I don’t mind the new logo too much. As a person who is 23 years as an ACS member outside the US is does signify something a little more global. And I didn’t even know what the apparatus thingy in the old logo was until last year…so for me this one resonates more.

...don't even get me started on that situation 😂 Hah you're right I SHOULD!! Hah you know I'm writing up some insomniac anatomy today actually... I actually wrote a big article about it AGES ago and TBH I stand by every word to this day. slate.com/technology/2...

What Is Dopamine for, Anyway? Love, Lust, Pleasure, Addiction?

In a brain that people love to describe as “awash with chemicals,” one chemical always seems to stand out. Dopamine: the molecule behind all our most...

slate.com

Whatever the retirement age is for Social Security should be the retirement age for elected officials. And they shouldn't raise either anymore. 70 is well past the time the government should be paying you back for all your hard work.

every fact that is checked is a fact that is checked. every fact that is checked is a fact that is checked. every fact that is checked is a fact that is checked. every fact that is checked is a fact that is checked. every fact that is checked is a fact that is checked.

There’s also something to how women are socialized to be suspicious of flattery — it’s how we transfer responsibility for men’s desire onto women’s bodies; we are taught to defend against that in service to our “innocence” or whatever — whereas men accept flattery as their due. Perfect marks.

So in the last two weeks EIC of Science and a famous science communicator have lost massive amounts of credibility because of their reliance on LLMs... Some examples of how to lose trust with your audience to share with my students I guess.

I know many of us knitters already lost a lot of respect for Hank Green a while ago—but this is SO much worse. I hope science writers & science content creators are taking note. Want to go from someone who is trusted to having very little credibility? Using LLMs is a great way to achieve that.

I feel like a disappointed parent but I do appreciate that Hank Green was honest and admitted to his dependence on LLMs/genAI. Socials the pressure to post more than you actually can physically is high. But this is Hank Green. He can post slowly with the correct research and still do fine.

I work at a public library. People who want to use AI seem to have no trouble doing so. People who don't want to use AI have a harder time. I crowdsourced and then finalized this document "How to disable or avoid intrusive AI" and then gave it a short URL: notoai.org Please pass along if it's useful

An aircraft passenger oxygen mask: a drop down passenger mask with air bag and yellow plastic mouth and nose cover, oxygen tube has been cut; Demonstration model used by flight attendant crew for passenger instruction. Has text on the side indicating that it's non-functional.

"a country that worries abt declining birthrates cannot dismiss the material conditions under which women are expected to give birth, recover, earn money & raise children...Before asking why women are...not [having] children, America should ask whether it has done enough to deserve their motherhood"

Sarah Tuttle@niais.bsky.social · 5d ago

All of this and more. I wouldn't trade my children for the world. But this country has meant that I've traded a lot to be their mom. www.seattletimes.com/opinion/wond...

Restarted his PhD. Finished despite in five years in 2022. Applied for OPT and stayed for three years on it until he transition to a TN Visa in 2025. TEN YEARS ON AN F-1 paying taxes, doing science for this country. Starting a family. Doing everything to the letter. Today that path is gone

For people that lack the experience/context I arrived to the US in 2014 in an F-1 visa and finished my program in exactly 5 years. Additionally I was under OPT for 1 year. That means 6 years total under F-1 My husband arrived in 2014. Was forced to master out in 2017. Worked in OPT 6mo 1/n

Mitch Keller@mitchkeller.phd · 3w ago

Inside Higher Ed covered it on Thursday when the regime announced they would publish the final rule on Friday, and I thought their reporting was good (although there are still some giant unanswered questions about matters for undergrad students). www.insidehighered.com/news/governm...

On my 🔪 list: Thrift stores that don’t order clothes by size. Why am I looking through an ENTIRE rack of dresses and seeing no sizes above 10. Like what are we even doing?? Just make a rack that’s size 12/14+ for the entire store so I can look through your <5 pieces 😓