Roxy LaBelle

@insidejorb.bsky.social

Skronky she/her trans thot 32, ATLien Mudhoney was right about everything except heroin Underachieving singer/songwriter/multi-instrumentalist I am Upperslut

I watched it in grad school and was SHOOK. If you haven’t watched it, I’m not sure you can appreciate the significance of President Woodrow Wilson loving it so much that he screened it in the White House. The first film to be screened there, of course. It is incandescently racist.

jamelle@jamellebouie.net · 8mo ago

one thing that is important to know is that BIRTH OF A NATION is so racist that people at the *time*, in 1915, were like, “holy shit this is racist”

Nope. Sex Matters have long been banging the drum of "you can't change sex therefore transition can't work as a treatment and we should stop offering it to trans people" it's what Helen Joyce's whole "huge problem to a sane world" shit was about. They are 100% going for banning all transitions.

Alix Weasel@alixwzl.bsky.social · 8mo ago

Also, this is I think the first time I've seen Maya / Sex Matters actively come out and say that they don't think transition should be allowed for adults either? It's always been 'well adults can do what they want, we are worried about the children' - not 'this is a failed model that doesn't work'.

A screenshot from the BBC reporting on the Levy review.

"Sex Matters, a gender critical human rights organisation, said the review failed to consider whether the treatments offered by the clinics were effective. CEO Maya Forstater said: "It is a wasted opportunity to rethink a failed treatment model.""

The "trans women are hulking men with deep voices and hairy knuckles" or whatever narrative they want the public to associate with us doesn't hold up if the public starts to see trans people who are conventionally attractive/not visibly trans when they think "trans person."

The reason they're so focused on trans teens is that people who transition younger typically blend into society better. To the extent that they're willing to tolerate our existence in society at all, they'd rather we be easily identified by our appearance/voices/etc.

Danielle Froom 🏳️‍🌈@danifroom.bsky.social · 8mo ago

Cis people really have no idea how it feels to watch a regime hold a press conference to admit, on camera, the pogrom against trans people they've been waging for 11 months is not only real, but they're going to double down on genocide and try to wipe out all the children first.

Cis people really have no idea how it feels to watch a regime hold a press conference to admit, on camera, the pogrom against trans people they've been waging for 11 months is not only real, but they're going to double down on genocide and try to wipe out all the children first.

The NYT is aware of, at most, 3 trans people by name; the rest of us occupy ~the same space in their minds as an endangered species of venomous stinging insects, in that there’s a robust debate about letting us exit vs just killing all of us and who’s to say what’s right and what’s wrong, y’know?

charjaebug@jael.bsky.social · 8mo ago

Of all the trans people in the United States to ask about the anti trans passport policy, The New York Times saw it fit to talk to … Brianna Wu

Supreme Court
Gerrymandering
Birthright Citizenship
"This is, in my view, the most egregious thing the Trump administration has done," said Brianna Wu, a political fund-raiser who has had an "F" on her passport for at least 15 years but who expects that she will be required to receive an "M" when it expires.

The absolute kicker to all of this is that most of the solutions they are seeking already exist on your phone. They just need to be enabled by parents. But, no, they want to bring an East Wing demolition crew to everyone's internet because no one can be bothered going to "settings."