James Handscombe

@jameshandscombe.bsky.social

Executive Principal, Mathematician, Teacher, Wordsmith not necessarily in that order.

Mediocrity. How the Party of Disraeli, MacMillan, Churchill et al must despair having this nonentity and truly stupid person as leader.

And we should welcome that, in all the messy, complicated diversity that it brings. I'm just not quite sure how - and to what extent even whether one *should* - you can design a system that supports, values and understands each of those equally! There might be a Rawls-esque veil I don't get....

Social care and devo could go wrong but they're not intrinsically bad ideas. Selection at 14 is, however it's implemented. The only thing I'm claiming to know is that early selection leads to inequality, and there's good evidence for that.

If you’re a Gondorian soldier your experience with hobbits is a tiny guy shows up with a wizard and is immediately taken in the Steward’s counsel. He saves Faramir when the Steward goes mad. A second tiny guy arrives with the Rohirrim and kills the Witch King. The first one then goes on campaign …

Completely agree with this. I've always thought we should have a core academic curriculum to 16 that goes beyond maths/english/science. And yes maths to 18 is in principle a good idea (if the quals are designed right and it's funded properly!)

John Springford@johnspringford.bsky.social · 4d ago

Learned a lot from this. Also Sam's point about keeping options open reinforces the view that we specialise too early in *academic* subjects. Numeracy and literacy are very useful, but you can stop doing any maths/stats/humanities at 16.

For me the right answer is grow the economy and fund FE. What we're seeing here is governments (of both kinds) struggling to run the economy since 2016, and consequently looking for politically easier answers elsewhere - in this case, with the education system.

Ben Newmark@bennewmark.bsky.social · last wk.

Fwiw I think the right approach won't be found in formal assessment itself but outside it. We need more second chances, other routes to decent jobs and lives that aren't academic. Which I get is what AB like many others have tried is trying, but won't work because as @stephenkb.bsky.social says..

Is this a good time to mention that in college my History of Translation lecturer (Michael Cronin) told us that one of the first vernacular translations of The Illiad was into Irish, and the translator had to give the main characters dogs because in Gaelic society a free man had a dog

I fear for what I call The Inevitable Doom Loop of Vocational Education: - it starts off hard to get parity of esteem - loads of kids fail - it’s made easier - it’s seen as a doss and schools lump kids in to game outcomes - numbers drop - it gets cancelled

And good luck finding businesses to offer meaningful work experience to hundreds of thousands of 14 and 15 year olds. As ever a failure to acknowledge that our big challenge with vocational ed is our labour market.

Laura McInerney@missmc.bsky.social · last wk.

Don’t worry, I’m sure they’ve thought through how this will be staffed, funded, and the class size implications for GCSE options. They learned that from the last time, right? RIGHT? www.tes.com/magazine/new...

1. Babysitter or Bramblepicker? In the League of Gentlemen the Royston Vasey job retraining scheme was a joke because there were no good jobs in the area, hence the job seekers being offered a choice of Babysitter or Bramblepicker. This is a clever point about..

6.. finally, always important to remember English education is a success. Kids are more literate and numerate as a result of the changes over the last twenty years. These are the most important "employment skills" of all and anything that might risk this is dangerous.

This has just won the prize for most disgusting breakfast ever. Looks like ginger cake - is actually “old cheese” - prized by Vikings for tasting no worse after three months at sea than it did before setting out. Norwegian friends - is this a big prank following the World Cup?

Bild