Katie Eyer

@katieeyer.bsky.social

Rutgers Law Prof writing about equality law, statutes, and the constitution. Academic writing at: http://ssrn.com/author=879928

I worked for a civil rts firm that operated on a contingency fee basis. I made a tiny fraction of what I would have in Biglaw The Biglaw disdain for pls' attys-& claiming its just about $-is IMO just a way to avoid facing the moral bankruptcy of the work they do repping bigots & the JE's of the wrld

Blake Emerson@blakeprof.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Not the main point, but this is a real window into the elite law bias against contingency fees, which is the only way most non-rich people can get lawyers in civil matters. Particularly galling from Ruemmler, who decided the best thing to do after serving in the White House was to sell out

We're now in a downward spiral of partisan (& racial) gerrymandering: TX, then CA, now Southern states like TN and AL. Is there a way to stop this? In a keynote lecture I gave in February at Loyola Law School, I argue that yes, there is, but the path is narrow. Just posted to SSRN—

A Narrow Path Out of Gerrymandergeddon

<p>What would it take to end the present downward spiral of partisan gerrymandering in the United States?  This essay, a revised and expanded version of a

papers.ssrn.com

Not enough news coverage of how the insurrectionist reparations fund is a clear violation of the 14th Amendment. We need to enforce the Constitution in its original meaning and plain text. You can't imagine away parts of the Constitution just because it is politically inconvenient.

This is devastating though not surprising. I'm deep into my summer reading on PFAS and this move is deeply disturbing after I've learned all about the unconscionable ways in which government and industry have harmed human and environmental health from these chemicals. 😭

Sharon Lerner@fastlerner.bsky.social · 4mo ago

wow. EPA just announced a major PFAS rollback 😞 It's withdrawing drinking water limits for PFNA, PFHxS, GenX and PFBS that were finalized under Biden. The Trump administration says it needs to review the science—but the science was reviewed many many times over the years it took to pass these

Still not fully recovered, & won't be for a while but foster kitten Thanos is feeling a lot better than last night. Pain meds are helping to keep him comfortable & we are making sure to give him lots of cuddles. 🤞🤞🤞 no infection and he heals up well.

Bild
Katie Eyer@katieeyer.bsky.social · 4mo ago

6 week old foster kitten in the hospital after a significant injury. Please send good energy/prayers/whatever your spiritual practice allows that this little guy will be ok!

Small gray and white tabby kitten sits on a mat in front of a litter box.

Still not fully recovered, & won't be for a while but foster kitten Thanos is feeling a lot better than last night. Pain meds are helping to keep him comfortable & we are making sure to give him lots of cuddles. 🤞🤞🤞 no infection and he heals up well.

Bild
Katie Eyer@katieeyer.bsky.social · 4mo ago

6 week old foster kitten in the hospital after a significant injury. Please send good energy/prayers/whatever your spiritual practice allows that this little guy will be ok!

Small gray and white tabby kitten sits on a mat in front of a litter box.

This part bears emphasizing: The fact that the Trump admin says something is the law DOES NOT MAKE IT THE LAW. There has been a lot of confusion about this, including on the part of reporters. (Not @erininthemorning.com who is always on point). EOs aren't the law. The Kennedy decl isn't the law.

Erin Reed@erininthemorning.com · 4mo ago

8. The most consequential portion of the ruling addressed whether federal threats could override state civil rights law. The district court had reasoned that ordering the hospital to resume care would compel it to violate federal law. The Colorado Supreme Court flatly rejected that framing.

¶31 The trial court’s concern about opposing the public interest by ordering
CHC to “violat[e] . . . federal law” is also misplaced. Why? Because the Kennedy
Declaration isn’t federal law. See Regular Route Common Carrier Conf. of Colo. Motor
Carriers Ass’n v. Pub. Utils. Comm’n, 761 P.2d 737, 748–49 (Colo. 1988)
(distinguishing general statements of policy that don’t carry the force of law from
8 Transgender youth comprise approximately 3.3% of the youth population in the
United States. Jody L. Herman & Andrew R. Flores, How Many Adults and Youth
Identify as Transgender in the United States? (Aug. 2025), https://
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/trans-adults-united-states/
[https:// perma.cc/U5KP-X5WS]. So, transgender youth will always represent
fewer individuals when compared to the population at large, and a purely
numerical comparison will always leave them without protection when they are
discriminated against based on gender identity.
15
substantive rules, which must go through formal rulemaking and therefore do
carry the force of law); see also Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Schweiker, 649 F.2d 221,
224 (4th Cir. 1981). A declaration from the HHS secretary can be a basis for
exclusion from federal health care payment programs, but the Declaration itself
isn’t a federal law banning gender-affirming care. See 42

6 week old foster kitten in the hospital after a significant injury. Please send good energy/prayers/whatever your spiritual practice allows that this little guy will be ok!

Small gray and white tabby kitten sits on a mat in front of a litter box.

6 week old foster kitten in the hospital after a significant injury. Please send good energy/prayers/whatever your spiritual practice allows that this little guy will be ok!

Small gray and white tabby kitten sits on a mat in front of a litter box.

These arguments were offensively stupid. As I said at the time, the initial lawsuit was "really bad" and "egregiously misstates the law in a painfully obvious way." They lied about what English history showed and couldn't cite a single case in support of their argument. Do. Not. Concede. The. Law.

Quinn Yeargain@yeargain.bsky.social · last yr.

I'm reading through the lawsuit now, and I'm going to live-post my reactions to it. The lawsuit is linked below. My immediate reaction: this is really bad, and egregiously misstates the law in a painfully obvious way. gov.texas.gov/uploads/file...

A reminder: the map that Alabama is sprinting to put back in place is a map struck down by a 3-judge federal court not only for a VRA violation, but also because it reflected _intentional_ discrimination. That is, the map Alabama is trying to reinstate is unconstitutional, even beyond Callais.

Milligan v. Allen (was Merrill) - All About Redistricting

All About Redistricting: all the information about the law and process of redistricting Congress and state legislatures, tracking the history and progress of the maps, reform proposals, and redistrict...

redistricting.lls.edu

1/3 A question for the voting rights experts about Callais. The majority says that the plaintiffs in a Section 2 VRA challenge must demonstrate that their proposed districting would "meet all of the State's legitimate districting objectives" just as well, including partisanship.

Breaking: Tennessee Republicans pass new 9-0 gerrymander after SCOTUS destruction of Voting Rights Act eliminating state’s only majority-Black district & last Democratic seat. Splits Memphis, which is 63% Black, into 3 districts to disenfranchise Black voters. Quite literally a return to Jim Crow

a thought i had while talking to a friend is that a federal end to partisan gerrymandering has to be at the top of the democratic party's agenda, and may likely get there because of threat the status quo poises to black representation, and thus black political involvement altogether.

I am not sure most people understand how completely bananas these investigations are. Title IX has an explicit carveout for private college admissions (meaning it is entirely up to Smith who to admit). This is not just arguing for a reinterpretation of Tile IX, it is plain and simple bad faith.

Eric Michael Garcia@ericmgarcia.bsky.social · 4mo ago

The U.S. Department of Education opened an investigation Monday into Smith College, an all-women’s institution in Massachusetts, for admitting transgender women. www.politico.com/news/2026/05...

So pls must prove intentional discrimination, without over-relying on proof of effects and historical racism, while having to actively disprove partisan intent; must also produce a map that achieves the state's nonracial goals, which can include maintaining a partisan map w/ few maj-min districts

A Democratic president with simple majorities in Congress could enact proportional representation for the House—no amendments required. 50%+1 could end the filibuster, expand SCOTUS, expand the House, and enact PR by state. And add new states like D.C. to rebalance the Senate while they’re at it

Lee Drutman@leedrutman.bsky.social · 4mo ago

"So in one stroke, PR could do a better job fighting racial vote dilution than Section 2 ever did, and do so without triggering equal protection objections." electionlawblog.org?p=155758

Big news! On Mon the Montana S Ct held that anti-transgender discrimination is sex discrim under the Montana constitution, and that anti-trans discrim is itself suspect. The decision affirms a prelim inj of a MT law/policy prohibiting BC & ID amds where inconsistent w sex assigned at birth. A 🧵: