Luke Sanford

@lcsanford.bsky.social

Assistant Prof. at Yale School of the Environment. Political economy of climate and environment, land use change, remote sensing, causal ML. https://sanford-lab.github.io/

The correlation coefficient is not a proper scoring rule. An agent who ranks models by correlation can be beaten by an infinite class of alternative rules. Here's a 2007 article on proper scoring rules: sites.stat.washington.edu/raftery/Rese...

This skeet will self destruct@pardoguerra.bsky.social · 2mo ago

This is quite the finding for a device thats just a plagiarism machine, or whatever we are calling it this week. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Thank you for all the support and reposts! We've gotten a steady stream of inquiries and submissions for this competition, but also some ANXIETY that the window will close before people have a chance to submit. We're nowhere near that! We'll update on here when we've allocated 50% of the capacity.

Alex Coppock@aecoppock.bsky.social · 8mo ago

🎺 Call for proposals 🎺 1️⃣ replicate an existing experiment 2️⃣ run a novel experiment on repdata.com 3️⃣ coauthor with Mary McGrath and me to meta-analyze the replications and existing studies 4️⃣ publish your study details: alexandercoppock.com/replication_... applications open Feb 1 please repost!

Call for Proposals: Data Collection for
Replication+Novel Political Science Survey Experiments
Alexander Coppock and Mary McGrath
January 27, 2026
We invite proposals for a survey experiment replication+novel design competition. Se-
lected replication+novel design survey experiments will be conducted on large samples of
American respondents, quota sampled to match U.S. Census margins and filtered for quality
and attention by the survey sample provider Rep Data (repdata.com).
Each proposal consists of two parts: (1) a replication study of an existing, previously
published survey experiment, and (2) a novel experimental design on a topic of the authors’
choosing.
The replication studies and reanalyses of the existing studies will be combined into a
meta-paper to be co-authored by all authors of accepted proposals along with the princi-
pal investigators (Coppock and McGrath). As a condition for acceptance, authors commit
to sharing the data and producing a write-up of the findings from their novel design for
submission to a scholarly journal, and public posting of a working paper pre-publication.

Watching Jurassic Park, where a computer nerd with a debt problem and delusions of grandeur tears down all the safety systems, with no understanding of the consequences, so he can better facilitate his planned espionage and theft.

If Vladimir Putin had a plan to foul our air and water, wreck public health and drive America over the cliff of irreversible lethal climate change, it would look exactly like Lee Zeldin’s plan. This is a plan for self-inflicted environmental disaster. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

Trump’s environmental rule-shredding will put lives at risk, ex-EPA heads say

Former agency leaders, including two Republicans, say rollbacks by Lee Zeldin could cause ‘severe harms’

theguardian.com

@jonproctor.bsky.social @vivianodavide.bsky.social @bstewart.bsky.social and others I can't find tags for

Luke Sanford@lcsanford.bsky.social · 2y ago

9/9 Other great work in this area: www.nber.org/papers/w30861, arxiv.org/abs/2501.18577, arxiv.org/abs/2411.10959, arxiv.org/abs/2306.04746 focus on “predict-then-debias”—the right move if using off the shelf data. But if you’re training the ML model yourself, give our adversarial approach a try!

Want to go visit the national parks this year? Sorry. The reservation system is shut down, EMT personnel are gone, so don't get hurt or lost. No one can clean the bathrooms or cabins, so they'll be closed. Rangers are fired. www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/arti...

Yosemite halts camping reservations, with no timetable for their return

Yosemite halts camping reservations, with no timetable for their return at a time when federal employees are being laid off

sfchronicle.com

Exactly, we're always "wanting one weird trick" for causality but I think that's usually (RCTs actually are one weird trick) going to be at odds with the reality that you need to understand the system you're studying in a lot of detail to do good inference