Two things about this: 1. It's interesting that all the controversy about AHRC centres on where it seeks to protect women 2. If "soft resistance" means males deliberately entering women's spaces despite being asked not to, that's cast-iron proof for why the protections in law are necessary
My near-term prediction is this will be met with soft resistance (and not always principled, or at least as much motivated by unwillingness to pay and sheer indifference) initially from British civil society, and the next round fight is a bunch of lawsuits from GCs to try and force compliance.