Marina Bolotnikova

@mbolotnikova.bsky.social

Senior reporter for Vox thinking about factory farming & animal rights, agriculture & the future of food, science & its discontents, cities, housing, transit and ✨ideas✨. marina@vox.com. Skeptical of epistemic authority~

Some ppl in my intellectual community don't agree with me but I believe it's important to have a prosperous economy. & one of my master theories about the world is that we squander SO much of our natural resource base on animal agriculture, which is not economically important. 1/

Bild

You could put solar panels on something like a quarter of the land we use to grow biofuel corn and power the entire United States. AND we wouldn’t need fertilizers made from fossil fuels! You can even grow shade crops around the panels! This is so dumb I can’t help using all the exclamation marks!

Marina Bolotnikova@mbolotnikova.bsky.social · 3w ago

We're destroying what remains of the world's rainforests for biofuels that aren't benefitting the climate at all, & the Trump admin's unprecedented expansion of the state-manufactured market for soybean oil-based diesel will make it all the worse. It really be that bad :(

Biofuels are so bad. And the Trump EPA’s latest biodiesel requirements are going to have catastrophic implications for the world’s rainforests, & so many horrors are coming from this admin at all times that few people have the time to pay attention. Piece on this tk!

🧵The first peer-reviewed meta-analysis of leather's carbon footprint, by Mikaila Roncevich & @matthewhayek.bsky.social, finds that leather's emissions are about 70% higher than previously thought & WAYY higher than vegan leather (both synthetic & bio-based). Gift link: www.vox.com/future-perfe...

Leather is not an innocent byproduct of the meat industry

Your leather purse might put out as much carbon as 35 hamburgers. But the alternative doesn’t have to be junky pleather!

vox.com

It is hardly news that the noisy correlation-based data on ultra-processed foods is very low-quality, but it turns out that the UPF randomized controlled trials probably don't offer strong evidence of the harms of "ultra-processing," either. Gift link: www.vox.com/future-perfe...

The evidence against “ultra-processed” foods is weaker than you think

New analysis suggests other factors may explain the harms blamed on “ultra-processing”

vox.com

Seitan (which I make at home with vital wheat gluten) is slandered as an "ultra-processed food" which as @mbolotnikova.bsky.social writes is a silly dietary paradigm that deserves to die. You should care much more about what's in your food than what's been done to it! www.vox.com/future-perfe...

The evidence against “ultra-processed” foods is weaker than you think

New analysis suggests other factors may explain the harms blamed on “ultra-processing”

vox.com

As long as people are allowed to leverage seemingly “woke” or “progressive” language to make the argument for the stagnation of infrastructure, it puts those who want to invest in upgrading roads and amenities in a real optics bind. See: resistance in Seattle to weekend closures of LWB for cycling.

BildBild
Will Stancil@whstancil.bsky.social · last mo.

What makes me furious is how people love to go hog-wild about how gentrification ruins lives, but you have large swathes of urban America festering in miserable poverty for decades, segregated, with no jobs, predatory businesses, appalling schools, and that’s, like, just local color or something?

I'm very struck by the research asking Americans if they prefer to live in a walkable area even it means having a smaller home. Pew has lowest percentage I've seen, with 44% of Americans preferring walkability, & even that is way higher than the share who actually have access to such housing

Bild