Michel Lind

@michel-slm.name

#Meta production engineer working on #Linux userspace, longtime #Fedora contributor, #Debian maintainer #Midwest #USA transplant, lay monastic, mostly harmless avatar: bespectacled man wearing a CentOS T-shirt background: Fedora 39 GNOME night wallpaper

So we know AI helped a negligible number of students. But how many did it harm? I've crunched the raw data provided by the lead researcher, and what I've found is that ~9,500 students using AI studied less than even the *least* studious, non-AI using student. This should shock the conscience.

Bild
Benjamin Riley@benjaminjriley.bsky.social · 2w ago

Both the Economist and others suggest this study demonstrates that AI can help students. So I contacted the lead researcher to figure out how many. Answer: Out of ~26,000 kids, a total of 20. And five months after starting to use AI, only four continued to spend 65 minutes on homework. Four.

Both the Economist and others suggest this study demonstrates that AI can help students. So I contacted the lead researcher to figure out how many. Answer: Out of ~26,000 kids, a total of 20. And five months after starting to use AI, only four continued to spend 65 minutes on homework. Four.

Graph of student exam scores correlated to homework completion time for to groups, students using AI and those that did not. There is a slight spike for studens using AI who also maintained extensive homework completion time. As described in post, the number of students falling into this bucket was 20 out of 26,000.
Benjamin Riley@benjaminjriley.bsky.social · 2w ago

I mean, c'mon. What this data shows is (a) there's a huge number of students using AI and not studying for very long compared to peers; and (b) negligible "benefits" for students who did study for comparable time periods and used AI.

Great to have @mjhaugen.bsky.social on the show! We dig into the many ways government enables all the harms we’re seeing from generative AI and hyperscale data centers by crafting policy that helps the companies behind them.

Tech Won’t Save Us@techwontsave.us · 2w ago

The AI boom isn’t just being pushing by major tech companies; it’s enabled by a suite of government policy. This week @mjhaugen.bsky.social joins @parismarx.com to discuss how government is putting AI before people and the planet. Full ep: techwontsave.us/episode/341_...

More than 10,000 excess deaths were recorded across Europe in recent heatwaves. Wildfires are raging across the continent, and here at home. Climate change is here. The govt cannot afford to ignore or roll back from their climate commitments, especially during Ireland's term in the EU Presidency.

Important piece on London and data centres in the FT. Include's Foxglove's call for concrete conditions to ensure local water and energy supplies, or the environment, are not endangered. If not, developers shouldn’t be allowed to build. www.ft.com/content/67db...

Data centres vs housing: how London became a central battleground

The city has become the largest hub for AI power centres across Europe, competing with homes for energy, space and water. Its priorities are being called into question

ft.com

ANTHROPIC: Our son loves humanity and for the low price of trillions and trillions of dollars will usher in an era of unprecedented peace and prosperity! OPENAI: Our horrible oafish son is hacking web sites without our permission. ANTHROPIC: (eyes narrowing) Our son is also evil

Just in case you still use any Basecamp products, DHH is crashing out about his AI product gently pointing out that it’s bad for him to have extermination fantasies about the Roma people.

DHH tweet saying “This is why we need competition and open weights in Al. Imagine a world where only Anthropic sat as the moral arbiter of acceptable speech. Fucking ridiculous. (Grok of course did it no problem, same too with Kimi K).” when presented with his blog post using a slur about the Roma people.

As a young journalist, I was taught that it is highly unethical to let a source buy you a cup of coffee. What, then, is this strange business model in which journalism is a big lucrative circle-jerk with billionaires?

I think most economists wouldn’t find it that amazing. Most of the late 19th and 20th century saw a massive redistribution of wealth. But Kristian’s chart tells us little about wealth inequality: it’s looking at wealth *concentration*. You need to look at the less wealthy majority too.

Bild

I'm pleased to share this new paper, "The myth of 'catch-up' development". The paper assesses trends in core-periphery inequality since 1960, and draws several main conclusions: 🧵https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13563467.2026.2659076

The myth of catch-up development: trends in core–periphery inequality from 1960 to 2023

The conventional narrative in international development holds that poorer countries are “catching up” with richer countries through the process of capitalist growth. This paper assesses this claim ...

tandfonline.com

"French control of Algerian territory launched a period of unparalleled misery… The one million or so Muslim Algerians who died in the mid-1860s perished precisely because the new land policies imposed by the French government destroyed the ability of locals to lead self-sustaining lives."

The Blood Circle

Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill were part of a small but blood-soaked circle of liberal thinkers who embraced the murderous logic of empire.

liberalcurrents.com

Marco Rubio announced a “campaign to dismantle” the International Criminal Court, the Hague-based tribunal tasked with investigating war crimes and more. Rubio accused the court of “waging a war against our country — not with bullets or missiles, but with the force of so-called international law.”

Marco Rubio Threatens to “Teach” the ICC the “Full Meaning of American Resolve”

The secretary of state announced what he characterized as a “campaign to dismantle” the International Criminal Court.

buff.ly